Yep, I knew I was missing something obvious. Darn. So, it's actually 7
rows of 11 for 77 plus the 5 rows of 10 for 50 more, making 127. by using 1
less in every other row, making triangles, you can put the rows closer
together and get more rows. The height of an equilateral triangle 528 feet
on a side is 457.26 feet, approx. Now, there may well be an even better
packing method. Who can beat 127?
Bill
_____
From:
az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[
mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Loran
Wilcox
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:03 PM
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com;
bill@freeholder.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
Looked at it again then its rows of 11 and 10
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Nolan <
mailto:bill@freeholder.com>
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
Nope, 106 looks right. 10 in the first row, and then 9 in the second. That
means the second row can be 457.26 feet from the first. Then alternate 10
and 9. It looks like you would end up with 6 rows of 10 and 5 of 9 for 125,
but you actually have room for a bit over 11.5 rows, so you can forget the
triangles and make the last three rows all 10, so you end up with 7 rows of
10 and 4 of 9 for 106. Of course, it's late, and I'm probably missing
something obvious or important, in which case, I'm sure someone will let me
know soon..
Bill in Willcox.
_____
From:
az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[
mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Loran
Wilcox
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 9:40 PM
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
I would believe 121
Team Sand Dollar
----- Original Message -----
From: David Thompsen <
mailto:dthompsen@yahoo.com>
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
I could fit at least 126 caches into a square mile without violating the 528
foot rule.... but maybe that's a puzzle cache for another day. :)
--Dave, The Cow Spots
360 <
team360usa@yahoo.com> wrote:
Just got this notification from my "O.K. Corral" cache listing:
This is an automated message from Geocaching.com
You are receiving this email because you are the owner of this listing.
Location: Arizona, United States
TadCooler found O.K. CORRAL (Virtual Cache) at 3/13/2005
Log Date: 3/13/2005
Had fun in Tombstone while in Arizona for spring training. Thanks.
Hmmmm. Maybe we have a celebrity major league cacher out there...
Also, did you know?-
The maximum number of caches you can fit in a square mile is 100? Well, that
is IF GC.com actually stuck to their .1 "ahem"..."guideline".
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
_____
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try
<
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=31637/*http:/smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/>
our new resources site!
_____
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
_____
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)