Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks

Well I'll say this, I without the assistance of RTW, the Great Jackalope hunter, have come up with a new Urban Micro solution larger than the World Record caches but smaller than a Decon Container... I'll just use the Shot gun approach to getting all these Dog Parks caches approved :),,, alright maybe only one or two and a special one for Gidget's enjoyment.

Now what about that GPS jammer???

and I found two caches and saw 2 yellow jeeps thus leaving a balance of 6 caches to find to break even.....


----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Wood
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks


At 04:27 PM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:

    What makes you think I don't want opinions? 

Sorry, just got that impression.

    IMHO it's about time the powers to be cracked down, being how there are a wide group of people who do the approving of the placed caches It depends on the person doing the approval....Then again why they went away from the GPS takes you to the Cache in the first place will remain a mystery...what good are rules if they are not enforced??? 

If I were in charge and made the rules, I would leave geocaching.com as a place to post waypoints. I wouldn't be in the business of determining if a cache is worth of existing. I can understand making sure that the cache pages are complete.

You are right, there is a real problem with having admins that can subjectively determine if a cache should be listed. I don't know what the answer is, but I suspect that we are going to see more and more rules as to what is allowed to be posted as a geocache. I just don't see this snowball being pushed back uphill.



In liberty,


Scott


wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com