Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Scott Wood
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks
At 04:27 PM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>What makes you think I don't want opinions?


Sorry, just got that impression.

>IMHO it's about time the powers to be cracked down, being how there are a
>wide group of people who do the approving of the placed caches It depends
>on the person doing the approval....Then again why they went away from the
>GPS takes you to the Cache in the first place will remain a mystery...what
>good are rules if they are not enforced???


If I were in charge and made the rules, I would leave geocaching.com as a
place to post waypoints. I wouldn't be in the business of determining if a
cache is worth of existing. I can understand making sure that the cache
pages are complete.

You are right, there is a real problem with having admins that can
subjectively determine if a cache should be listed. I don't know what the
answer is, but I suspect that we are going to see more and more rules as to
what is allowed to be posted as a geocache. I just don't see this snowball
being pushed back uphill.


In liberty,

Scott


www.myblueheaven.com