Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks

What makes you think I don't want opinions?

IMHO it's about time the powers to be cracked down, being how there are a wide group of people who do the approving of the placed caches It depends on the person doing the approval....Then again why they went away from the GPS takes you to the Cache in the first place will remain a mystery...what good are rules if they are not enforced???

Then as it was pointed out to me there are other geocaching websites to get a cache hidden.....


----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Wood
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks


At 11:15 AM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:

    Cache Permanence 

    As the Frequently Asked Questions indicate, geocaches can be hidden in a location for a finite period of time, depending on the environment and the decision of the cache owner. 

I am not in this to argue, I was just posting a concern about what the admins will think of a cache if it says in the description that it will only be there for a certain period of time. There has been a lot of discussion about this over on the geocaching.com forums, and there seem to be lot of caches that are not being approved because of this, and there doesn't always seem an objective reason why some caches get approved and others don't. I use the virtual I placed in Idaho as a perfect example. One of the rules says that it needs to be something unique that might be found in a coffee table book. The location of my virtual cache has actuall been in a coffee table book, I have a copy, and the cache was still denied at first because the admin still didn't think it was worthy, even though it complied with each and every rule.

Do what you want, but if you don't want opinions about it, why post it to the listserve?





In liberty,


Scott


wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com