Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Scott Wood
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks
At 11:15 AM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>Cache Permanence
>
>As the <http://www.geocaching.com/faq.asp>Frequently Asked Questions
>indicate, geocaches can be hidden in a location for a finite period of
>time, depending on the environment and the decision of the cache owner.


I am not in this to argue, I was just posting a concern about what the
admins will think of a cache if it says in the description that it will
only be there for a certain period of time. There has been a lot of
discussion about this over on the geocaching.com forums, and there seem to
be lot of caches that are not being approved because of this, and there
doesn't always seem an objective reason why some caches get approved and
others don't. I use the virtual I placed in Idaho as a perfect
example. One of the rules says that it needs to be something unique that
might be found in a coffee table book. The location of my virtual cache
has actuall been in a coffee table book, I have a copy, and the cache was
still denied at first because the admin still didn't think it was worthy,
even though it complied with each and every rule.

Do what you want, but if you don't want opinions about it, why post it to
the listserve?




In liberty,

Scott


www.myblueheaven.com