Hi Jim,
I'm looking forward to trying your Buster Spring Cache - just because no
one has gone after it yet doesn't mean that there aren't at least a few of us
scheming to go after it. I know of at least 2 groups who I've talked to
about it (and of course Team Wyle is probably scheming too!). Sure it's a
bit more challenging, but that will make it's finding that much more
satisfying. In the meantime, have patience. I like a good mix of caches,
some easy, some hard, some just time consuming. I placed a cache a bit over
a week ago that isn't hard to get to, but will take about a 6 hour round trip
from Tucson to find. It's certainly my most time consuming hide to date.
On the other end of the spectrum, I have one that is only about 10 minutes
from a good road and another that's right off a freeway exit (you'll probably
recognize which one that is).
Jim.
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Jim Stamm wrote:
> After a long time, and many miles, I finally placed a cache at Buster
> Spring (GC441F). I felt that it was a good placing at the time because
> it offered challenge, variety of attack routes, and hopefully a sense of
> accomplishment for the successful geocacher.
>
> Now I am having second thoughts, and wanted some input before placing
> another. The emphasis seems to be on the number of caches, and the speed
> with which they are attained. Buster Spring will definitely hinder that
> type of goal. Is it a bad idea to place caches in Arizona that eat up
> time?
>
>
> -Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
Jim Scotti
Lunar & Planetary Laboratory jscotti@pirl.lpl.arizona.edu
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721 USA http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/
(text/plain)