Hi Jim,
   I'm looking forward to trying your Buster Spring Cache - just because no
one has gone after it yet doesn't mean that there aren't at least a few of us
scheming to go after it.  I know of at least 2 groups who I've talked to
about it (and of course Team Wyle is probably scheming too!).  Sure it's a
bit more challenging, but that will make it's finding that much more
satisfying.  In the meantime, have patience.  I like a good mix of caches,
some easy, some hard, some just time consuming.  I placed a cache a bit over
a week ago that isn't hard to get to, but will take about a 6 hour round trip
from Tucson to find.  It's certainly my most time consuming hide to date.  
On the other end of the spectrum, I have one that is only about 10 minutes
from a good road and another that's right off a freeway exit (you'll probably
recognize which one that is). 

Jim.

On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Jim Stamm wrote:

> After a long time, and many miles, I finally placed a cache at Buster 
> Spring (GC441F).  I felt that it was a good placing at the time because 
> it offered challenge, variety of attack routes, and hopefully a sense of 
> accomplishment for the successful geocacher.
> 
> Now I am having second thoughts, and wanted some input before placing 
> another.  The emphasis seems to be on the number of caches, and the speed 
> with which they are attained.  Buster Spring will definitely hinder that 
> type of goal.  Is it a bad idea to place caches in Arizona that eat up 
> time?
> 
> 
> -Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> 

Jim Scotti                              
Lunar & Planetary Laboratory         jscotti@pirl.lpl.arizona.edu 
University of Arizona                
Tucson, AZ 85721 USA                 http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/