[Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache

[Regan Smith]

what is the GC#?

Then again just like burried caches, way to many out there and how 
burried is burried? slightly covered ect.....

Wrong is wrong and the right thing to do is point it out and blame all 
the other cache loggers for not....

ShadowAce wrote:
> Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think.
>
> City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from 
> the bench.
> They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed 
> it back on.
>
> To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city 
> benches until you find the correct one.
>
> Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem 
> with caches such as this?
>
>
> *
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
> Database version: 5.11230
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ 
> <http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/>
> *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
> Database version: 5.11230
> http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20081130/feef2091/attachment.htm