Similarly, they archived one of my caches that I disabled due to
construction in the area. I posted a note on the cache before the archive
stating that I was wanting to hold the cache disabled until the construction
was complete to re-evaluate archiving it myself then. I sent a subsequent
note to the approver that archived it which went ignored, or at least
un-responded to.
The cache was named "Mostly 7's" and ended with 4 sevens in both the
longitude and latitude. Moving the cache to an adjacent location would have
undermined the whole concept of the placement.
Jake - Team A.I.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Bob & Linda Smith <
Lrsmith@cableone.net>wrote:
> I think I must agree here that some things GC see as needing
> heavy-handedness. They decided to archive one of my caches that I
> temporally archived because I had not replaced it within 30 days. I
> explained in a note that I was laid up with a serious leg injury and would
> get to it asap. I don't think they read that but just acted on the flag on
> my tempory archive. Which by the way must be fairly new as they threatened
> to archive another of my caches when I temporally archived it over a year
> ago and the flag just popped up. I found that I needed to post a different
> kind of log other than just a note.
>
> I still look after a couple of caches for away owner that are close to me.
>
> Anyway, we get a note whenever our caches are logged on line and should act
> on the note if needed.
>
> Jumping off box onto bad leg Ouch!!
> Bob Smith, Team Petite Elite, Prescott, AZ
>
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)