Re: [Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location

I'm half of Team Caballero. I limit my searches for caches that are 1.5 or
less for terrain, but you're absolutely right. Sometimes a 1 is a 5 for me.



From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Gale
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 9:07 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location




Melinda, which team are you? I also have physical limitations. The Tonto
Forest ones are beyond my abilities too. One thing I find frustrating is
when folks who are not handicapped rate a cache 1/1 when its a half mile
hike or you have to climb to get it. For someone like me, sometimes these
things are the equivalent of climbing Mount Everest. I wish I could get the
hiking caches. Its not meant to be. I enjoy the urban ones tho.

Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking



Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
"Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"



Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898



--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Melinda <melinda.caballero@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Melinda <melinda.caballero@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 6:56 PM

I have physical limitations to where I can go seek caches. Urban caches are


the ones I can get to most easily. So please don't archive it or move it!


And whoever suggested that the Tonto forest is the way to go can go hang.


They're lucky they can hike to get to caches! Thank you for putting a


cache


where I can find
it!