I'm half of Team Caballero. I limit my searches for caches that are 1.5 or less for terrain, but you're absolutely right. Sometimes a 1 is a 5 for me. From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Gale Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 9:07 PM To: listserv@azgeocaching.com Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location Melinda, which team are you? I also have physical limitations. The Tonto Forest ones are beyond my abilities too. One thing I find frustrating is when folks who are not handicapped rate a cache 1/1 when its a half mile hike or you have to climb to get it. For someone like me, sometimes these things are the equivalent of climbing Mount Everest. I wish I could get the hiking caches. Its not meant to be. I enjoy the urban ones tho. Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so: "Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges -- "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!" Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898 --- On Sat, 12/20/08, Melinda wrote: From: Melinda Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location To: listserv@azgeocaching.com Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 6:56 PM I have physical limitations to where I can go seek caches. Urban caches are the ones I can get to most easily. So please don't archive it or move it! And whoever suggested that the Tonto forest is the way to go can go hang. They're lucky they can hike to get to caches! Thank you for putting a cache where I can find it!