Gecaching Reviewers have no idea what the cache is when placed and too few
cachers would report it to make it worth mentioning.
Every cache owner checks the 'I have permission for this cache' box so
groundspeak assumes nobody would lie, cheat or steal.
They all get listed and unless cachers police our own, nobody will. So I
will not fault geocaching reviewers for the behavior of cachers.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Mark Fleming <
mrkfleming@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm somewhat surprised that the gc.com admins let that one through. I
> can't imagine they would condone taking apart property like that for a
> cache.
>
> GoNorthWest
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:15 PM, ShadowAce <shadowace.az@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think.
>>
>> City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from the
>> bench.
>> They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed it
>> back on.
>>
>> To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city benches
>> until you find the correct one.
>>
>> Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem
>> with caches such as this?
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
(text/plain)