Re: [Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Regan Smith
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache
what is the GC#?

Then again just like burried caches, way to many out there and how
burried is burried? slightly covered ect.....

Wrong is wrong and the right thing to do is point it out and blame all
the other cache loggers for not....

ShadowAce wrote:
> Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think.
>
> City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from
> the bench.
> They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed
> it back on.
>
> To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city
> benches until you find the correct one.
>
> Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem
> with caches such as this?
>
>
> *
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
> Database version: 5.11230
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
> <http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/>
> *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
> Database version: 5.11230
> http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>