Thank you for saying what I was trying to say. I knew there was more to
this than I could see on the surface. I log, I enjoy, I Co-FTF if I
can't FTF first and I enjoy reading logs, especially from the caches I
have out.
Bob Smith, Petite Elite
ShadowAce wrote:
> Ok 360, let me get this correct..
>
> You absolutly refuse to log caches at all because someone else is
> telling you what you must do or not to. You maintain your own list of
> caches you claim to have visited but nobody else can ever know because
> then big brother would be able to stalk you also. But at the same time
> you have the gall to come on here and comeplain about logs I have been
> writing since November of 2003?
>
> Sorry, I refuse to allow you to dictate how I can log a cache since
> you do not even feel it is worth your time to write a log for the
> people who placed the cache and others to enjoy.
>
> Now get back on that soap box but please when you dictate to us, make
> sure it is not something so minor.
>
> I will continue to log Co-FTF and Shared-FTF. If you ever want to join
> us for one of the 14 mile hikes and we get a FTF, we will be ok with
> your not saying you Co-FTF. We might even enjoy the company still.
>
> On 8/21/05, *TEAM 360* <team360usa@yahoo.com
> <mailto:team360usa@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> [rant] Now, just what in the heck is this garbage about "Co-FTF"
> or a "Shared FTF" I have been seeing on cache pages lately? Just
> when I thought I saw it all, another new way to inflate the
> numbers comes along. What a cheatin' way to pump up the FTF count!!
>
> Listen, there is NO such thing. The cacher who signs the logsheet
> FIRST should be the only one to claim the FTF. The other cacher is
> SECOND-TO-FIND. It is a fact of cache-finding that cannot be changed.
>
> Anyone claiming a "Co-FTF" or "Shared FTF" casts doubt on the rest
> of their caching record, in my opinion...of course, so do the
> people who hide caches under sock puppet accounts and then go
> claim a find on them, or people who claim finds because they
> simply "got close", or did maintenance on a cache and posted
> another find on it, etc, etc...the list goes on and on... [/rant]
>
(text/plain)