Re: [Az-Geocaching] New cache size

I really think they should also make another category under micro. I cant
beleive they didnt. If micro is a log only.... then what are all these
microscopic caches popping up these days that cant even hold a respectable
size logbook (or even logsheet).... heck, some of them cant fit a logbook at
all and dont even contain logsheets! There should be a category for those so
I can be sure to avoid them! I think a 'logsheet' should be big enough to
fit a decent number of logs and also big enough to include the geocache.com
disclaimer on it to be an approved cache.

Scott
Team RTW

>From: "EvilFISH" <EvilFish@cox.net>
>Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
>Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] New cache size
>Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:00:10 -0700
>
>I would say micro is the log only
>small would be the altoids container that holds real small items
>regular would be something that could hold a TB
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brian Cluff" <brian@Snaptek.com>
>To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
>Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 11:43 AM
>Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] New cache size
>
>
> > Can someone give me a cache as an example that is set to this new size
> > so that I can update the site to be able to identify them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian Cluff
> > Team Snaptek
> > Azgeocaching.com

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/