I really think they should also make another category under micro. I cant beleive they didnt. If micro is a log only.... then what are all these microscopic caches popping up these days that cant even hold a respectable size logbook (or even logsheet).... heck, some of them cant fit a logbook at all and dont even contain logsheets! There should be a category for those so I can be sure to avoid them! I think a 'logsheet' should be big enough to fit a decent number of logs and also big enough to include the geocache.com disclaimer on it to be an approved cache. Scott Team RTW >From: "EvilFISH" >Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com >To: >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] New cache size >Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:00:10 -0700 > >I would say micro is the log only >small would be the altoids container that holds real small items >regular would be something that could hold a TB >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Brian Cluff" >To: >Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 11:43 AM >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] New cache size > > > > Can someone give me a cache as an example that is set to this new size > > so that I can update the site to be able to identify them. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Cluff > > Team Snaptek > > Azgeocaching.com _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/