There's always the "you have to start somewhere" thing, but with caches listed in 180 countries on gc.com, it's akin to someone who can only program in QBasic taking on Microsoft in the battle for desktop dominance. Personally, unless they ban approval of ALL caches, I'm going to continue to support Groundspeak and TPTB over there, with the occasional grumbling when something ruffles my feathers. I love the forums on gc.com (700+ posts should hint at that), so why try to fight a losing battle by trying to convert the world's 60,000+ cachers to another site that in all likelihood couldn't handle the traffic?
Brian
Team A.I.
>
> From: "Bill Tomlinson" <billtomlinson@qwest.net>
> Date: 2003/09/15 Mon PM 09:57:02 EDT
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Navicache listings
>
> I don't get it. I took a look. There are only 16 caches listed for Arizona
> and 11 are yours. Obviously, nobody is using that site. What's the point
> in double entry?
>
> CacheLess
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of J H/TEAM
> 360
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 5:27 PM
> To: az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Navicache listings
>
>
> I must say, I am a bit disappointed that there aren't more Arizona caches
> listed on the "other" site, Navicache. I actually listed my caches over
> there as well today, and it's very user-friendly. They even have easy-to-use
> buttons for handicapped access, parking lot, water, restroom facilities
> nearby, etc..when you list a cache, along with a better system for adding
> clues. There is no reason why you can't put your caches on both websites, I
> would like to see more support of this site.
> Just a thought, that's all.
> Jeff of TEAM 360.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=10469/*http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com>
> SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
>
>
>
Message
I
don't get it. I took a look. There are only 16 caches listed for
Arizona and 11 are yours. Obviously, nobody is using that site.
What's the point in double entry?
CacheLess
-----Original Message-----From:
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[
mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of J
H/TEAM 360Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 5:27 PMTo:
az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.comSubject: [Az-Geocaching]
Navicache listings
I must say, I am a bit disappointed that there aren't more Arizona caches
listed on the "other" site, Navicache. I actually listed my caches over there
as well today, and it's very user-friendly. They even have easy-to-use buttons
for handicapped access, parking lot, water, restroom facilities nearby,
etc..when you list a cache, along with a better system for adding clues. There
is no reason why you can't put your caches on both websites, I would like to
see more support of this site.
Just a thought, that's all.
Jeff of TEAM 360.
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo!
SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design
software
(text/plain)