Re: [Az-Geocaching] Munged stats?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Gale Draper
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Munged stats?
So who put 36 caches as member's only caches? Here we are at 195 caches, so close to the 2 century mark, and now we've dropped to 159. Is it time to play "find the missing caches?"

Brian Casteel <> wrote:Yikes. A few days ago, I had 19 out of state finds, with the 424 in-state finds. Suddenly, a portion of Arizona appears to have been annexed to another state as 51 caches now appear OOS. Any ideas?

Brian
Team A.I.



Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
"Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"



Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software