I think that the article was pretty kind to geocaching. they did not mention that went the owner were contacted about removing the caches they made them member only in order to hide them from the land managers ect.
We will be known by the tracks we leave behind
----- Original Message -----
From: Donn Sanford
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Anyone see this?
Any plans by anyone other than me to rebut the erroneous portions of the
article?
-----Original Message-----
From:
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[
mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Brian
Cluff
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 5:06 PM
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Anyone see this?
Gale Draper wrote:
> This article was mentioned on the geocaching forums. Did anyone see this?
>
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0602negeocaching02.h
tml
> I know this is from "the bad people" at the trashy Republic.
From the article...
"Scottsdale officials consider the caches to be a form of
littering, and the game encourages visitors to veer off trails
and use motorized vehicles to find the containers, all illegal
activities in the preserve."
WTF! Since when has geocaching encoraged anyone to use a motorized
vehicle to find a cache?!?
I tend to agree with the rest of the article... shame on the sign
ignoring people....
Brian Cluff
Team Snaptek
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)