RE: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater

I assumed (and still do) that Gale was referring to the next entry which
indicates this person went caching with someone else. Gale - is that right?

Andy



-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of RAND
HARDIN
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:07 PM
To: AZ-Geocaching
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater


Gale,

Just because a person states "Nice location!" on the cache page doesn't
mean that the individual found the cache. In the case of the cache that you
reference, I could look at the map and determine the cache is located in a
"nice location."

It's also possible the individual may be driving to/past the caches
without actually finding them, but is claiming them as a virtual.

I believe it's understood that a log book/sheet must be signed at the
cache location to claim a find on the web page (unless the cache is actually
a virtual and/or has other rules for claiming a find). I have no objection
to a cache owner deleting an entry if there is no proof that the individual
actually found the cache. If there is a question from a cache owner, an
email to the individual asking to explain where and how the cache was found
and/or asking for a description of the cache should clear up some doubt.

Rand

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: gale 'Desert Viking'
    Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:10 PM
    To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
    Subject: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater

    If this is the person you are referring to, check out this log entry for
Feb/2002.
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=10655&log=y&decrypt=
There's another one I remember seeing that may exhonerate him. I'm still
looking for it.