Hmmm... I drive past 3 virtuals every day on my way home. These particular ones I can see from the car very easily (they're big). Maybe I ought to log them. ;-)
-T.
[General Bracket]
=========================================
Don't inflict bad quotes on me! Get OE-QuoteFix!
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
----- Original Message -----
From: RAND HARDIN
To: AZ-Geocaching
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
Gale,
Just because a person states "Nice location!" on the cache page doesn't mean that the individual found the cache. In the case of the cache that you reference, I could look at the map and determine the cache is located in a "nice location."
It's also possible the individual may be driving to/past the caches without actually finding them, but is claiming them as a virtual.
I believe it's understood that a log book/sheet must be signed at the cache location to claim a find on the web page (unless the cache is actually a virtual and/or has other rules for claiming a find). I have no objection to a cache owner deleting an entry if there is no proof that the individual actually found the cache. If there is a question from a cache owner, an email to the individual asking to explain where and how the cache was found and/or asking for a description of the cache should clear up some doubt.
Rand
----- Original Message -----
From: gale 'Desert Viking'
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:10 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
If this is the person you are referring to, check out this log entry for Feb/2002. http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=10655&log=y&decrypt= There's another one I remember seeing that may exhonerate him. I'm still looking for it.
(text/plain)