[Az-Geocaching] New Fake cache logger - FYI

[Jake Olson]

Similarly, they archived one of my caches that I disabled due to
construction in the area.  I posted a note on the cache before the archive
stating that I was wanting to hold the cache disabled until the construction
was complete to re-evaluate archiving it myself then. I sent a subsequent
note to the approver that archived it which went ignored, or at least
un-responded to.

The cache was named "Mostly 7's" and ended with 4 sevens in both the
longitude and latitude.  Moving the cache to an adjacent location would have
undermined the whole concept of the placement.

Jake - Team A.I.

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Bob & Linda Smith <Lrsmith at cableone.net>wrote:

>  I think I must agree here that some things GC see as needing
> heavy-handedness.  They decided to archive one of my caches that I
> temporally archived because I had not replaced it within 30 days.  I
> explained in a note that I was laid up with a serious leg injury and would
> get to it asap.  I don't think they read that but just acted on the flag on
> my tempory archive.  Which by the way must be fairly new as they threatened
> to archive another of my caches when I temporally archived it over a year
> ago and the flag just popped up.  I found that I needed to post a different
> kind of log other than just a note.
>
> I still look after a couple of caches for away owner that are close to me.
>
> Anyway, we get a note whenever our caches are logged on line and should act
> on the note if needed.
>
> Jumping off box onto bad leg Ouch!!
> Bob Smith, Team Petite Elite, Prescott, AZ
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20090317/c3d02386/attachment.htm>