[Az-Geocaching] GC.com slow?
Mark Fleming
mrkfleming at gmail.com
Sat Feb 14 13:18:53 CST 2009
Personally, I think the $0.08 per day gc.com costs me is an absolute
steal compared to what I get back.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 13, 2009, at 8:41 PM, AZcachemeister
<azcachemeister at getnet.net> wrote:
> Some companies I have worked for based their business model on the
> concept that the existing customers would quit sooner or later, so
> any effort to keep them (like good excellent service) was a waste of
> time. Time that could be better spent finding new customers.
>
> I guess that is one way to do it...
>
> ACM
>
>
> Michael Weiner wrote:
>>
>> *nod*
>>
>> <rant>
>> I agree, but having formally been the systems administrator that
>> basically built and ran the linux environment for
>> AmericanGreetings.com a number of years ago, and doing all that it
>> took back then to survive the STORM on a day like Valentine's Day
>> at a greeting card company, i have an especially keen sight on what
>> it takes to run services like this. And if you really want to talk
>> about the /. affect i can definitely describe that in pretty good
>> detail, LOL. And honestly i dont get it...rather than paying for
>> and improving infrastructure for stability and good load balancing
>> they focus on things that dont necessarily improve their
>> environment, but rather increase the bottom line. Now, not that
>> that is a bad model for a business, but when folks are paying for
>> 'services' and you cant provide them with a lot of reliability, you
>> will begin to loose your paying userbase and HURT your bottom line
>> in the long-term.
>> </rant>
>>
>> Michael (of TeamDotOne)
>> --
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:32 PM, ShadowAce <shadowace.az at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> Sadly, like other new features (whereigo), it requires special
>> equipment.
>>
>> Looks like groundspeak is moving away from the days when an old
>> eTrex yellow was all you needed to play :(
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:30 AM, <moosemob at cox.net> wrote:
>> Works for me right now, but it was dead at 5:00 AM It might be
>> related to the test they are doing on http://Live.Geocaching.com
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20090214/0da6ab4e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Az-Geocaching
mailing list