[Az-Geocaching] Yeeehaw!

[Richard Daines]

I can think of a couple of cache right of the top of my head that are at
Junior Colleges.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:45 AM, PATRICK FINLEY <Fastball50 at msn.com> wrote:

>  Paul hit the nail right on the head. I'm convinced that a lot of cachers
> really don't even read the guidelines for placing caches, and very
> frequently place caches that don't adhere to those guidelines. Based on the
> history of that particular school, I'm not so sure I would have allowed a
> cache of this type to be placed there. The fact that the cache owner was a
> teacher at that school and that HE didn't read the guidelines makes it even
> worse. It would sure be nice if most folks put a little more thought into
> the placement of their caches instead of just spewing out cache
> containers.................My 1 1/2 cents worth.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* AZPAUL <azpaul1 at cox.net>
> *To:* listserv at azgeocaching.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:13 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Yeeehaw!
>
> It seems that the teacher did have permission of the school district, as
> the teachers quote in the article indicates  *"My administration knew; I
> also got a district grant for it,"*. Unfortunately it didn't get passed on
> to the rest of the teaching staff.
>
> The main problem was the following guideline was ignored by the teacher and
> his class.
> From GC.COM
> *"Caches near, on or under public structures deemed potential or possible
> targets for terrorist attacks. These may include but are not limited to
> highway bridges, dams, government buildings, elementary and secondary
> schools, and airports."
>
> *That's my two cents worth....
> Paul
>
>            ----- Arizona Geocaching -----
> ----- Where difficulty is measured in degrees -----
>
>
>
> Rich B wrote:
>
> A few things come to mind here:
>
> 1. Obviously whom ever placed the cache didn't get permission from the
> school, or if the teacher did get permission the entire staff should have
> been told about the cache being there.
> 2. I though you were not suppose to bury caches
> 3. Why didn't the people from Nevada explain to the person asking what they
> were doing, considering it was at a school.
> 4. Sadly some of the students comments shows what the future holds.
>
> Just my $0.02 worth :
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Richard Daines <rjdaines at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sad to see how timid people are.
>>
>>  On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:01 PM, ShadowAce <shadowace.az at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://www.coloradodaily.com/news/2009/apr/20/fairview-high-boulder-evacuated-students-dismissed/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resourcehttp://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20090422/76daa16e/attachment.htm>