[Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location

[joe Highley]

There is nothing wrong, nothing, with a quick urban cache!  If other cachers are so opposed to them, let them go to the tonto area and hide/find caches themselves.

Visit www.Geocaching.com and www.podcacher.com



> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:15:14 -0500
> From: ellvira at cox.net
> To: az-geocaching at listserv.azgeocaching.com
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Good or bad location
> 
> I have a cache at the Organ Stop Restaurant which is not just a restaurant but a wonderful place to take your family for an enjoyable adventure. It has been muggled a couple of times. Recently someone suggest that I archive it. The reason was that "a restaurant parking lot was not a good place for a cache." They went on to tell me that there were many scenic places in the Tonto forest to place a cache.
> 
> I would love to be able to have caches that are out in great scenic areas but I have a full time job and cannot always get out to those types of places and therefore could not maintain them properly.
> 
> I also think that this cache location was a great idea. I have had a lot of positive feedback but this was the first negative comment and I guess I was kind of hurt. I responded that I was going to look for a more secure area at the same location and this was when they suggested the forest cache.
> 
> So my question to you all is this. Are these types of locations good......or bad? Shall I archive it as suggested....or get more creative and find another place at the same location??
> 
> Ellvira
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20081220/5ecd8f2b/attachment.htm