[Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

Sat Feb 10 10:02:31 MST 2007

I wonder if a deleted log means a deleted find.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: AZcachemeister 
  To: listserv at azgeocaching.com 
  Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:17 AM
  Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

  Well, I don't like to insult people by saying their cache is crap, but aren't they insulting us by bringing us to those areas?
  There is nothing of interest at the back of the 99¢ store, nor anything clever about a shoe-polish can stuffed in a crack in the building.
  If we don't start taking some responsibility for our activities, someone else will.
  If enough people start 'telling it like it is' then the cachers hiding those type of caches just might get the hint.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Regan Smith wrote: 
    Tftc

    Tnlnsl

    Honesty will get your log deleted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of ShadowAce
    Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 6:15 PM
    To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
    Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

    Scott, 

      With all due respect. Oct 25, 2005 4:02 PM you sent email about how Micros were evil and now that you had finally reached the top find counter in the state you were not going to be going for micros any longer. How only Urban caches had any reason to exist and people should help stop the spread of micro spew. 

     Yet a very large percent of your cache finds are micros even after the posts about how Micros should go away. 1114 terrain 1 and 735 difficulty 1 according to the stats you placed on your profile. While I am sick of lamp poles and guard rails myself, I merely pointed that story out because of how many people caching in Arizona tell me at almost every single event 'Permission is not required' or 'Its public property'. 

     If cachers want to place a micro every 600 feet they will. If they throw caches out with no intention of ever maintaining them, they will. Why? Because every other cacher is writing 'Great cache, thanks for the hide' and not writing.... 

    I was able to grab this cache quickly though I had to shield the location with my rear side from the dumpster divers. or After sifting through the garbage left by the homeless in the area, we found your cache. 

     Never would have known about this place, because we generally avoid dumpsters.

     I have been trying to be very honest in my logs about areas such as these and instead of getting 'Hay thanks for warning me that place was going to be so terrible', I receive emails saying 'Why are you such an ass? If you dont like the cache, dont go find it!' 

     Welp the problem with this is from the writeups you have no idea if it will be a real interesting place such as the one we found last night called Hope, or in a pile of trash until you get to the location.

     So instead of complaining about the TYPE of cache, I was merely pointing out that Permission should be obtained on ALL cache hides. Heck I spent 2 years getting permission for one place. 4 weeks to get permission for another cache. 5 weeks of emails to get permission for one location and then other people just throw more caches in the area when they came.. Yep I caught hell from the person that granted me permission to place mine after that.. Joy joy... 

     If people hate micros so much, why do they continue to grab them and write 'Thanks for the fun'?

    On 2/9/07, Roping The Wind <arizcowboy at hotmail.com> wrote:

    The geocacher who placed the altoid tin says he "wished others had told him
    this was not a good place to put a cache". I can only laugh at that
    statement. The gc.com site clearly states that you must get permission to 
    place a cache on private property!!! Did he not read that little tidbit of
    information? Typical of alot of urban cache hides. Is he now trying to put
    it onto the geocaching community as a whole? Making the whole game/community 
    look bad?

    I do agree though that law enforcement over reacted... kinda like the little
    Boston cartoon 'bomb' scare thing.

    The other thing that comes to my mind is that he is relatively new to the 
    game and this is most of what he has seen so far... a bunch of altoid tins
    behind stores and on electrical boxes and the like. So, he might have
    thought it was totally ok to hide a cache like this... even though, as I 
    mentioned before, he should have gotten permission to place it in the first
    place.

    I do like this quote though: "I've discovered that I really don't like urban
    caching. I'd rather do it in the woods. That's where it's really fun," he 
    said.

    As of the past month and a half now, I have not found an urban cache hide. I
    dont mind going a week without finding a cache anymore. But I have decided
    that I only want to do rural area caches. Caches that require a hike to get 
    to or maybe a nice 4x4 drive or maybe just a drive by cache placed in a
    beautiful location way outside the city limit signs. Or maybe caches placed
    in small towns is ok too. Basically, caches placed with the location in 
    mind. I have been using the DGP geocaching site lately to pick and choose
    caches to find.

    The past month or so, I have found a much greater enjoyement for the game
    again. It feels like the old days of caching 4 or 5 years ago when I first 
    began. I can't say I will never find an urban cache again. But I am
    carefully picking and choosing which ones I want to find.

    Scott
    Team Ropingthewind

    _________________________________________________________________ 
    Laugh, share and connect with Windows Live Messenger
    http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline

    ____________________________________________________________ 
    Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
    To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
    http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

    Arizona's Geocaching Resource
    http://www.azgeocaching.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ____________________________________________________________
  Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
  To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
  http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

  Arizona's Geocaching Resource
  http://www.azgeocaching.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.33/678 - Release Date: 2/9/07 4:06 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070210/a0aaea9d/attachment.htm 