[Az-Geocaching] Cacher has cops called and detained by Home Depotemployees

AZcachemeister azcachemeister at getnet.com
Tue Aug 15 19:44:13 MST 2006


In reality, caches on private property like Home Depot, Kohls, or Ikea 
are probably a bad idea, EVEN _WITH_ PERMISSION!

So Joe Cacher goes to the manager, and gets approval...the right thing 
to do, yes?
He gets the manager's name and number, and even posts them on the cache 
page. So far, so good.
The manager is _so good_ as to even inform all the employees about the 
approved cache. Now we in like Flynn!
Weeks and months go by, employees come and go. Have they all been 
informed about the APPROVED Geocache on company property?
More weeks and months go by, I am looking for the cache, and am 
challenged by a rookie store employee who never heard of the manager who 
approved the cache because that manager has since been assigned to the 
store in Duluth. Employee turnover has left no-one who remembers about 
the Geo-what on the property, and the police are called.


Jon Liming wrote:
> Well, soeaking as a law enforcement officer,  if I encountered a 
> situation like this and wasn't a geocacher, I would've handled it much 
> in the way that the officer Scott ran into did.
>
> Now I'm not a lawyer and no legal advice is offered in this, but the 
> detained cacher in question may have an actionable offense against 
> Home Depot for unlawful detainment. In a case like this, Home Depot 
> could have directed the cacher to leave and not return, but the 
> detention is in question. Law Enforcement often has to deal with over 
> zeolous businesses doing things like this. I'd wager the officer was a 
> little less than tactful if it happened as recorded since this type of 
> nonsense takes away from our real jobs. Best thing to do in a 
> situation if you were dentained in this manner is to simply walk away. 
> If they attempt to detain you, inform them you will be filing a 
> lawsuit. Chances are, they will back down. Also, the cacher in 
> question in this home depot incident probably needs also mention the 
> person in charge of the detention in his or her letter to the 
> corporate office. Odds are this person will recieve some sort of 
> reprimand and retraining on how to handle these situations.
>
> I also prefer more remote caches, mostly because I don't like being 
> watched when I'm caching.
>
> Jon
> Team LawDog
>
> */Roping The Wind <arizcowboy at hotmail.com>/* wrote:
>
>     While I agree the situation that occured at the Home Depot is a bit
>     extreme...
>
>     MANY caches placed in urban areas are often placed at business
>     locations...
>     usually in parking lots (lamp posts) or around back of the stores,
>     etc.
>     Although these places 'seem' to be public, they are VERY MUCH private
>     property. THE CACHE OWNER NEEDS TO GET PERMISSION WHENEVER A CACHE
>     IS PLACED
>     ON PRIVATE PROPERTY!!!! It is stated so clearly on the
>     geocaching.com web
>     site! Unfortunately, probably 99 percent of the time, the cache
>     owner does
>     not get permission and just places the cache, thinking the area is
>     public.
>     Unless you are patronizing the business, then you are trespassing.
>
>     I thought a person would have to be asked first to leave, then if
>     they
>     didnt... they could be considered trespassing. But I am not a police
>     officer, so I dont really know the extent of that law. But that
>     isnt what
>     this is about.
>
>     It is about getting permission before placing caches on private
>     property. I
>     can tell of a similar situation at a cache behind the businesses on
>     Stapley/60. I was searching for the cache when a police officer
>     came up and
>     asked me what I was doing. I told him I was geocaching and
>     explained what it
>     was and offered to show him the cache. He wasnt really interested
>     and just
>     told me I needed to leave or whatever and that I was trespassing.
>     So I left.
>     I have had similar situations a number of times.
>
>     I can tell you of yet another situation I encountered. I parked my
>     truck in
>     the parking lot of a business to find a cache nearby. This cache
>     was not
>     actually on this businesses property. But rather on the property of a
>     business across the street! This cache took me a while to find,
>     but it didnt
>     take very long for a tow truck to show up to my truck. As I came
>     back to my
>     truck, I found the tow truck getting into position to hook it up.
>     After some
>     smooth talking, I was able to leave.
>
>     Perhaps some people get a thrill out of the 'stealth' factor of
>     geocaching
>     in urban places such as these and the need to trespass to find a
>     cache.
>     Perhaps the cache owners get a kick out of reading logs about
>     situations
>     like this and even situations like that that occured at that Home
>     Depot.
>     Frankly, I do not. We all know that it is easy enough to say we
>     are shopping
>     at the business and not that we are geocaching. But why should I
>     have to lie
>     to someone when I am approached? I just tell them what I am doing.
>     I am
>     geocaching. I will offer to show them the cache everytime. If they
>     dont like
>     it, I tell them how they can email the cache owner to have it
>     removed. If
>     they ask me to leave, I will leave. These situation are occuring
>     more and
>     more these days, it seems. But again, these situations should not
>     happen. If
>     the cache owner got permission in the first place. I would feel so
>     much more
>     relaxed and comfortable walking toward a cache in an area that is
>     questionable (in terms of private property) if the cache
>     description simply
>     said in it "this cache was placed with permission from property
>     owner".
>
>     Geocaching.com cant police these kinds of things. It is up to the
>     geocachers, those that find the caches, to police the game. If
>     there are
>     people out there that insist on placing caches on private property
>     without
>     the consent of the property owners... then the cachers that first
>     seek out
>     those caches should put an archive note log on the cache page.
>     This assumes,
>     of course, that the cache description doesnt have something
>     stating that
>     permission was obtained to place the cache. If it doesnt state in the
>     description that permission was obtained, I can only assume that
>     it was not.
>
>     There are several caches placed at Home Depots around the valley,
>     I might
>     add.
>
>     I would bet any amount of money, that if you asked a store owner
>     if you
>     could place a cache on the property..... most of the time they
>     would be cool
>     with it (why not!? It promotes the store and brings more people
>     onto the
>     property).
>
>     You will notice that over the past year or more, I have been doing
>     less and
>     less urban caching. I prefer caches outside of the city areas, as
>     I dont
>     have to deal with stuff like this. I still do urban caches, but I
>     dont feel
>     the need to go find every one anymore. There are several within a
>     couple
>     miles of my house that I have passed up on finding because they
>     just dont
>     interest me anymore. I have no interest in playing 'stealth ninja'
>     anymore.
>     I did that for many years back in my childhood days. Ive grown up
>     since. Its
>     situations like the one that just occured at the Home Depot that
>     turn me off
>     more and more from geocaching. But soon enough, I find myself out
>     on a quite
>     and pleasant hike thru the forest to search for a tupperware
>     container or an
>     ammo box in some quite remote location that keeps the joy and
>     excitement of
>     geocaching alive for me.
>
>     Scott
>     Team Ropingthewind
>
>
>     ____________________________________________________________
>     Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>     To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>     http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>     Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>     http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20060815/31b7256a/attachment.htm


More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list