[Az-Geocaching] Re: Power Trail not approved!

[Brian Casteel]

I remember that cache all too well.  I spent probably 4 hours on it one day,
most of that spent waiting.  I got to stage 11, and had to wait because
there was a large party going on in a nearby ramada (think Halloween
Radioactive), and the 3 teenage girls probably would have caused me to have
significant injuries had the very big relatives nearby thought I was doing
something...weird trying to retrieve that stage.  I grabbed a book and sat
in another ramada nearby for a good 1.5-2 hours reading, hoping they would
leave.  I came back 3 hours later and they were finally gone.  5 minutes
later I was at Step 12, in absolute darkness.  :)

Brian
Team A.I.

-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Rand
Hardin
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 4:09 PM
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Power Trail not approved!


Dave,

I agree with you that the 12 Step Program is a great multi-cache.  Scott's
comments about multi-caches in general was something I thought was humorous
considering he placed the 12 Step Program.  The context about multi-caches
vs. individual caches is exactly what the Power Trail discussion is about.

Rand Hardin
(RandMan) 

************************************************************************

DAVID THOMPSEN WROTE:

It's funny that that cache comes up in the power trail context... I think
that the 12 Step program is hands down the best multi cache of the 70-some
that I've done.   People will do multi's if they're quality.
 
--Dave, The Cow Spots

************************************************************************

Rand Hardin wrote:

I'm sitting here shaking my head and thinking about what Scott Sparks just
wrote about multi-caches...and at the same time remembering "SPROCKET'S 12
STEP PROGRAM" (GCD812). (hehehehe) ;-) :-D

SPROCKET'S 12 STEP PROGRAM:
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=06608f57-b159-4c5d-8e
cb-c125c449e0da

Rand (RandMan)

************************************************************************

SCOTT SPARKS WROTE:

Concerning the multi-cache versus multiple individual caches issue, I 
would, by far, prefer to see multiple individual caches, each with 
their own logbook. As anyone who has maintained or hunted for a 
multi-cache knows, it only takes one missing step of a multi-cache to 
make the whole multi-cache worthless and un-findable. 

************************************************************************

____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


 

DISCLAIMER:
This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail address or by calling the telephone number associated with this transmission. Please delete this e-mail from your computer (or discard this fax).  Thank You.