[Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -

[Koch, Dan]

Wow...your intolerance is amazing, especially when it doesn't concern or
affect you at all.  

BTW, the Cardinals are already sequestered so I don't think this 'holier
than thou' attitude will help you become the new Pope.

LazyK - Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-
> geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Brian Casteel
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 6:33 PM
> To: listserv at azgeocaching.com; ShadowAce
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -
> 
> Given the history we've seen, I guess my response would be:
> 
> GO AWAY KEN.
> 
> I tried helping you in the past to understand how much this type of
> behavior
> upsets people, but it appears to have done no good.
> 
> Brian
> Team A.I.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ShadowAce" <shadowace.az at gmail.com>
> To: <listserv at azgeocaching.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 6:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -
> 
> 
> > Here is his reasons:
> >
> > - The travel bugs that I removed from this cache had been in the cache
> > an average of 25 days each, and each of these travel bugs had been
> > passed up by an average of 10 geocaching teams before I grabbed them.
> > I took five travel bugs, but I immediately moved two of them to nearby
> > caches later in the same day. I took pictures of those travel bugs and
> > uploaded them to both my cache and travel bug log entries.
> >
> > - There is no need for a travel bug hotel in this location. There are
> > many geocaches nearby with regular-sized containers. This is not in
> > the middle of the city but is near the edge of Tonto National Forest.
> > There are over 50 caches within a five-mile radius of this location,
> > and most of these caches have containers that are large enough to fit
> > most travel bugs. It may take a little more effort, but if one has
> > multiple travel bugs, isn't it better to put them in a variety of
> > different caches rather than one single cache?
> >
> > - This cache is exposed and is very close to a street corner. The
> > cache site is close enough to be seen by motorists who are stopped at
> > the stop sign. Whenever I come here, I see new litter desosited in the
> > area, and usually I pick some of it up. There is good chance that this
> > cache could be found accidentally by a non-geocacher, who would likely
> > take the cache and/or it contents, especially since the contents
> > contain a large variety of music and computer CDs which is more
> > valuable than the contents of most caches. I do not like to put travel
> > bugs in caches that I feel are too exposed.
> >
> > - The geocacher who commented on what I did on the cache page has
> > nearly 1,000 cache findings, but has more than 2,000 travel bug
> > findings. I, on the other hand, have close to 1,600 cache findings,
> > but I have less than 400 travel bug finds. Enough said.
> >
> > Ken Akerman (a.k.a. Highpointer)
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com