[Az-Geocaching] what is legal about Illegal

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:44:46 -0700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C2C854.FCEA0B40
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

is it just me or does the people doing the approval of caches seem to =
not care as to the location of a cache?

I made a comment last week that a new cache is in the Superstition =
Wilderness area according to the map=20
after it was determined that the Rangers don;t want it there. Then today =
another cache that plainly says on the Indian reservation...
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C2C854.FCEA0B40
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>is it just me or does the people doing =
the approval=20
of caches seem to not care as to the location of a cache?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I made a comment last week that a new =
cache is in=20
the Superstition Wilderness area according to the map </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>after it was determined that the =
Rangers don;t want=20
it there. Then today another cache that plainly says on the Indian=20
reservation...</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C2C854.FCEA0B40--