[Az-Geocaching] RE: Different Strokes For Different Folks

Jeff Moriarty listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:47:50 -0700


I totally agree that if the approvals are inconsistent then handle it
through the site.

You said you haven't gotten much value from the site, but you have listed at
least 30 hits on their site.  That means you are using all the work that has
gone into building the site, you are using their software, using their
internet bandwidth, using electricity on their servers, and using hard drive
space on their servers.  You are relying on their site to show you were
caches are to be found, and returning to their site to log your visit as
part of the experience.  Even Snaptek's great site relies on
Geocaching.com's data to operate.  Ask yourself this - if Geocaching.com
were to vanish then how much fun would this hobby be?   Perhaps you value
the site more than you think, and might want to consider that membership.

Jeff.

----- Original Message -----
From: "skydad" <skydad@cox.net>
To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 7:21 AM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] RE: Different Strokes For Different Folks


> We totally agree with Brian's comments about this cache. There really are
no
> rules stating that only kid friendly caches are appropriate for
> geocaching.com.  In fact, his point emphasizes the key issue that although
> we all appreciate the unpaid volunteers effort in supporting the sport and
> website maybe they let their personal beliefs spill over onto
> geocaching.com.  As Brian points our there already is at least one Arizona
> listed "Adult Only" cache on the site.  Is it to be instantly removed by
one
> of the volunteers?  We think it is a great idea that there are a wide
> variety of caches to attract a wide variety of cachers and suggest
> ArizFunCouple contact Jeremy directly for his
> official" position on the matter.  I also agree with Brian that not being
a
> charter member does not mean you do not support the sport.  Although we
are
> members I have gained no real value from it.  We two have spent hundreds
of
> dollars on geocache logo'd items to leave in caches and apparel to
> demonstrate and spread the word of geocaching.  I would assume Jeremy has
> gained significantly more revenue from Brian's purchases then the $30
> membership fee.  The  issues point out that geocaching is many things to
> many people and there are many ways to support sport.
>
> The Lunch Club
>