[Az-Geocaching] RE: Different Strokes For Different Folks
skydad
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 07:21:12 -0700
We totally agree with Brian's comments about this cache. There really are no
rules stating that only kid friendly caches are appropriate for
geocaching.com. In fact, his point emphasizes the key issue that although
we all appreciate the unpaid volunteers effort in supporting the sport and
website maybe they let their personal beliefs spill over onto
geocaching.com. As Brian points our there already is at least one Arizona
listed "Adult Only" cache on the site. Is it to be instantly removed by one
of the volunteers? We think it is a great idea that there are a wide
variety of caches to attract a wide variety of cachers and suggest
ArizFunCouple contact Jeremy directly for his
official" position on the matter. I also agree with Brian that not being a
charter member does not mean you do not support the sport. Although we are
members I have gained no real value from it. We two have spent hundreds of
dollars on geocache logo'd items to leave in caches and apparel to
demonstrate and spread the word of geocaching. I would assume Jeremy has
gained significantly more revenue from Brian's purchases then the $30
membership fee. The issues point out that geocaching is many things to
many people and there are many ways to support sport.
The Lunch Club
----- Original Message -----
From: <az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
To: <az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:11 PM
Subject: Az-Geocaching digest, Vol 1 #890 - 7 msgs
> Send Az-Geocaching mailing list submissions to
> az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Az-Geocaching digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RE: Caches - Different Strokes For Different Folks (Brian LaFrance)
> 2. Re: Caches - Different Strokes For Different Folks (Brian Casteel)
> 3. Re: Congratulations on #200! (GREGG OBUCH)
> 4. Re: Caches in State Parks and other county/regional parks (Chelby
Geiss)
> 5. RE: Caches - Different Strokes - And Another More Fun
Topic...Hopefully :) (Brian LaFrance)
> 6. Re: Congratulations on #200! (Scott Wood)
> 7. Re: Congratulations on #200! (Scott Wood)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "Brian LaFrance" <brian@brianlafrance.com>
> To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Caches - Different Strokes For Different
Folks
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 19:00:58 -0700
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C2B9A3.C6D65BE0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Jeff,
>
> Apparently you are a very uptight individual. The comment that was made
> about changing the cache information was more sarcasm than a suggestion.
If
> you knew me (which you don't) I joke constantly about finding loopholes in
> systems and exploiting them (I'm a computer geek, that's part of my job).
> Does that mean I take action on it? No. It's the cache owner's
> responsibility to follow the rules of Geocaching.com. Do the rules state
> that a cache cannot be adult oriented? No. Do the rules say that a cache
> cannot be modified to be an adult cache? No. Therefore, was I telling
> anybody to break any rules? No. If Jeremy didn't want adult caches, he
> would have put that in the rules. The people who approve the caches are
> unpaid individuals, not Jeremy. One day you could get a person who would
> allow the adult oriented cache (see Put that in Your Pipe cache by Chicks
> With Trucks http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=32238 for
> an adult oriented cache), another day you would not.
>
> As far as not financially supporting Geocaching.com, who are you to tell
us
> that we need a charter membership to be supporting Geocaching.com? Team
> LeapLab (which I am a part of) has purchased several Geocaching.com items
> that support the site as well as over $400 in goods from OffRoute.com
which
> in turn supports Geocaching.com. I'm sure that many of the cachers in
> Arizona have done the same. I bet that the cut Geocaching.com got for all
> of our purchases was far more than the cost of a year's membership and we
> plan to make many more purchases as we get more into Geocaching.
>
> I do respect your opinion, but I felt that you should hear my side of the
> story before attacking me personally.
>
> Brian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Jeff
> Moriarty
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:06 PM
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Caches - Different Strokes For Different
> Folks
>
>
> Brian,
>
> I appreciate your reply, but you might want to go back and re-read my
> original message.
>
> First, I said "attitude of some of the Geocachers in this state", not
all.
> I have emailed and met several fellow cachers on the trails, and some of
> them are great. Others not so much.
>
> Second, please note that I was replying directly to Brian LaFrance, not
> Mark, the original poster. It was Brian who suggested deceiving Jeremy by
> changing the cache after posting it, and it pissed me off. I have no
> problem with Adults Caches, but you, Brian, Mark, and I don't have the
right
> to override their final decision on the matter. I have no problem with
> Mark's approach, and liked that he posted the cache info in this forum for
> interested parties. In my original post I even said "if you disagree with
> Geocaching.com's decision then discuss it, plead your case, etc.," so I
> don't understand why you felt I said anything to the contrary. My
argument
> was simply that if you don't like Geocaching.com's policy the one thing
you
> should NOT do is deceive them about it.
>
> I stand by my assertation that you should be ashamed of yourself for not
> being a charter member if you have found more than 20 caches. According
to
> the Geocaching.com site you have found 205 caches and hidden 3, and you
have
> done absolutely nothing to support Geocaching.com for all the
entertainment
> you have had. Who do you think pays for their electricity? Their
> computers? Internet connections? They need to pay their bills or they
will
> shut down. They are not a charity. This isn't about Member Caches. I am
a
> charter member and don't care for the idea, either. This is about people
> using their service and not paying for it. So since people like you who
> frequently use Geocaching.com won't carry your share, they are raising the
> rates for the people who DO pay. So I get to pay for your entertainment.
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Jeff.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C2B9A3.C6D65BE0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
> size=3D2>Jeff,=20
> </FONT></SPAN></DIV><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003>
> <DIV><BR><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Apparently you are =
> a very uptight=20
> individual. The comment that was made about changing the cache =
> information=20
> was more sarcasm than a suggestion. If you knew me (which you =
> don't) I=20
> joke constantly about finding loopholes in systems and exploiting =
> them<SPAN=20
> class=3D624043901-12012003> (I'm a computer geek, that's part of my=20
> job)</SPAN>. Does that mean I take action on it? No. =
> It's the=20
> cache owner's responsibility to follow the rules of =
> Geocaching.com. =20
> Do the rules state that a cache cannot be adult oriented? =
> No. Do the=20
> rules say that a cache cannot be modified to be an adult cache? =
> No. =20
> Therefore, was I telling anybody to break any rules? =
> No. If=20
> Jeremy didn't want adult caches, he would have put that in the =
> rules. The=20
> people who approve the caches are unpaid individuals, not<SPAN=20
> class=3D624043901-12012003> </SPAN>Jeremy. One day you could get a =
> person=20
> who would allow the adult oriented cache<SPAN =
> class=3D624043901-12012003> (see Put=20
> that in Your Pipe cache by Chicks With Trucks <A=20
> href=3D"http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D32238">htt=
> p://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D32238</A> for=20
> an adult oriented cache)</SPAN>, another day you would not. =
> </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV></SPAN><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003><FONT face=3DArial =
> color=3D#0000ff=20
> size=3D2>As far as not financially supporting Geocaching.com, who are =
> you to tell=20
> us that we need a charter membership to be supporting =
> Geocaching.com? Team=20
> LeapLab (which I am a part of) has purchased several Geocaching.com =
> items=20
> that support the site as well as over $400 in goods from OffRoute.com =
> which in=20
> turn supports Geocaching.com. I'm sure that many of the cachers in =
> Arizona=20
> have done the same. I bet that the cut Geocaching.com got for all=20
> of our purchases was far more than the cost of a year's membership =
> and we=20
> plan to make many more purchases as we get more into Geocaching. =20
> </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
> size=3D2>I do=20
> respect your opinion, but I felt that you should hear my side of the =
> story=20
> before attacking me personally.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D624043901-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>Brian</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
> face=3DTahoma=20
> size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
> az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com=20
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf Of =
> </B>Jeff=20
> Moriarty<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:06 =
> PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
> listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
> Caches -=20
> Different Strokes For Different Folks<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Brian,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I appreciate your reply, but you =
> might want to go=20
> back and re-read my original message. </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>First, I said "attitude of some =
> of the=20
> Geocachers in this state", not all. I have emailed and met =
> several=20
> fellow cachers on the trails, and some of them are great. Others =
> not so=20
> much.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Second, please note that I was=20
> replying directly to Brian LaFrance, not Mark, the original =
> poster. =20
> It was Brian who suggested deceiving Jeremy by changing the cache =
> after=20
> posting it, and it pissed me off. I have no problem with Adults =
> Caches,=20
> but you, Brian, Mark, and I don't have the right to override their =
> final=20
> decision on the matter. I have no problem with Mark's approach, =
> and=20
> liked that he posted the cache info in this forum for interested=20
> parties. In my original post I even said "if you disagree =
> with=20
> Geocaching.com's decision then discuss it, plead your case, =
> etc.," so I=20
> don't understand why you felt I said anything to the contrary. =
> My=20
> argument was simply that if you don't like Geocaching.com's policy the =
> one=20
> thing you should NOT do is deceive them about it.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I stand by my assertation that you =
> should be=20
> ashamed of yourself for not being a charter member if you have found =
> more than=20
> 20 caches. According to the Geocaching.com site you have found =
> 205=20
> caches and hidden 3, and you have done absolutely nothing to support=20
> Geocaching.com for all the entertainment you have had. Who do =
> you think=20
> pays for their electricity? Their computers? Internet=20
> connections? They need to pay their bills or they will shut =
> down. =20
> They are not a charity. This isn't about Member Caches. I =
> am a=20
> charter member and don't care for the idea, either. This is =
> about people=20
> using their service and not paying for it. So since people like =
> you who=20
> frequently use Geocaching.com won't carry your share, they are raising =
> the=20
> rates for the people who DO pay. So I get to pay for your=20
> entertainment. Thanks a lot.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
> size=3D2>Jeff.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C2B9A3.C6D65BE0--
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "Brian Casteel" <bcasteel@cox.net>
> To: <az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 19:25:59 -0700
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Caches - Different Strokes For Different
Folks
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C2B9A7.45ADF2E0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Just an FYI for everyone...
>
> Before this got out of hand, I took it private. Hopefully it will stay =
> there and out of the listserv. However, if need be, I will post my =
> reasons for not purchasing a Charter Membership here, should anyone else =
> question my reasons.
>
> Brian
> Team A.I.
> ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C2B9A7.45ADF2E0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Just an FYI for =
> everyone...</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Before this got out of hand, I took it=20
> private. Hopefully it will stay there and out of the =
> listserv. =20
> However, if need be, I will post my reasons for not purchasing a Charter =
>
> Membership here, should anyone else question my reasons.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Brian</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Team A.I.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C2B9A7.45ADF2E0--
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:39:49 -0800 (PST)
> From: GREGG OBUCH <gobuch@prodigy.net>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Congratulations on #200!
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> --0-1990608805-1042339189=:9004
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Another Tucson team would like to add our congratulations! Way to go
Scott and Ann, aka Team My Blue Heaven.
> Gregg and Maureen, MO & GO
>
> --0-1990608805-1042339189=:9004
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>
> <P>Another Tucson team would like to add our congratulations!
Way to go Scott and Ann, aka <STRONG>Team My Blue Heaven</STRONG>.
> <P>Gregg and Maureen, MO & GO</P>
> --0-1990608805-1042339189=:9004--
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 19:55:39 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Caches in State Parks and other
county/regional parks
> From: Chelby Geiss <chelby@desertsol.com>
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> One of my contacts from the Land Agency meeting was Dwayne Collier,
> State Coordinator for Arizona for the National Park Service. I also
> have casually talked with Jean Emery from Az State Parks. Both share
> basically the same view---Please contact the park personnel before
> placing a cache. This way sensitive areas are protected and
> "overcrowding" is avoided. A VERY good point they also brought up was
> that the rangers and other park workers know of some wonderful
> locations for caches...places most people may not know about! Mr.
> Collier was very excited to have cachers contact National Parks people
> and work together to place caches!!! TAKE HIM UP ON THIS OFFER! Its
> the best way to show geocaching goodwill! With the wonderful internet,
> its a snap to find out exactly who to contact! I have a list of
> National Parks people and the region they over see...if anyone would
> like to know exactly who to contact within the AZ National Parks, drop
> me an email! I'd be more than happy to point you in the right
> direction!
>
> Thanks Scott for posting the wonderful info!
>
>
> Team desertSol
> Chelby & Kevin
> +
> Kiva and Lancer (German Shepherds)
> Apache Junction, AZ
> www.desertsol.com/~chelby/geocaching
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: "Brian LaFrance" <brian@brianlafrance.com>
> To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Caches - Different Strokes - And Another More
Fun Topic...Hopefully :)
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:49:36 -0700
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C2B9B2.F3CDC020
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> That's cool...I can respect that. I just want to keep Geocaching fun.
> Also, I had a couple of questions for everyone...we are working on putting
> together really hard cache which would require the use of multiple
different
> resources as well as probably combine different types of caches. My
> questions are:
>
> 1. What would you consider to be the hardest cache in Arizona?
> 2. What type of cache location (i.e. Urban, Desert, Forest, etc.) do you
> prefer? Which do you dislike the most?
> 3. What types of caches (locationless, virtual, physical, multicaches) do
> you prefer? Which do you dislike the most?
> 4. Is there anything that you find fun about certain existing caches that
> you would like to see in future caches?
> 5. If there is trivia or solving a puzzle involved in finding a cache,
will
> you avoid it or does that appeal to you?
>
> I'll use the answers to these questions to make this cache fun for as many
> people as possible. Also, it may help some other people place caches that
> appeal to more people. Our first cache was set up to accomplish a
specific
> purpose, but some people seemed to think it was too easy. We realized
that
> it was easy, but that wasn't our goal. Our goal for our next cache is to
> give everyone a good challenge, yet keep it interesting enough that people
> will want to find it. After all, isn't that what geocaching is all
> about...getting people to find your caches.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Brian
> Team LeapLab
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Brian
> Casteel
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 7:26 PM
> To: az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Caches - Different Strokes For Different
> Folks
>
>
> Just an FYI for everyone...
>
> Before this got out of hand, I took it private. Hopefully it will stay
> there and out of the listserv. However, if need be, I will post my
reasons
> for not purchasing a Charter Membership here, should anyone else question
my
> reasons.
>
> Brian
> Team A.I.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C2B9B2.F3CDC020
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
> size=3D2>That's=20
> cool...I can respect that. I just want to keep Geocaching =
> fun. Also,=20
> I had a couple of questions for everyone...we are working=20
> on putting together really hard cache which =
> would require=20
> the use of multiple different resources as well as probably combine =
>
> different types of caches. My questions are:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>1. What would you consider to be the hardest cache =
> in Arizona?=20
> </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>2. What type of cache location (i.e. Urban, Desert, =
> Forest,=20
> etc.) do you prefer? Which do you dislike the most?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>3. What types of caches (locationless, virtual, physical, =
>
> multicaches) do you prefer? Which do you dislike the =
> most?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>4. Is there anything that you find fun about certain=20
> existing caches that you would like to see in future=20
> caches?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>5. If there is trivia or solving a puzzle involved =
> in finding=20
> a cache, will you avoid it or does that appeal to =
> you?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
> size=3D2>I'll=20
> use the answers to these questions to make this cache fun for as many =
> people as=20
> possible. Also, it may help some other people place caches that =
> appeal to=20
> more people. Our first cache was set up to accomplish a specific =
> purpose,=20
> but some people seemed to think it was too easy. We realized that =
> it was=20
> easy, but that wasn't our goal. Our goal for our next cache is to =
> give=20
> everyone a good challenge, yet keep it interesting enough that people =
> will want=20
> to find it. After all, isn't that what geocaching is all =
> about...getting=20
> people to find your caches. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>Thanks.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2>Brian</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
> size=3D2>Team=20
> LeapLab</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=3D721071503-12012003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
>
> size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
> face=3DTahoma=20
> size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
> az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com=20
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf Of=20
> </B>Brian Casteel<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, January 11, 2003 7:26=20
> PM<BR><B>To:</B> =
> az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B>=20
> [Az-Geocaching] Re: Caches - Different Strokes For Different=20
> Folks<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Just an FYI for =
> everyone...</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Before this got out of hand, I took =
> it=20
> private. Hopefully it will stay there and out of the =
> listserv. =20
> However, if need be, I will post my reasons for not purchasing a =
> Charter=20
> Membership here, should anyone else question my reasons.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Brian</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Team =
> A.I.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C2B9B2.F3CDC020--
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 21:24:04 -0700
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> From: Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Congratulations on #200!
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> At 04:57 PM 1/11/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >Congratulations to team My Blue Heaven for finally reaching the 200
plateau
> >today! They are the first Tucson area team to reach 200. Nice work
Scott
> >and Ann!
>
> Thank you Jim. I sort of planned out my day today so that one of your
> caches would be 200. I wasn't sure if it was going to be the Cat Mountain
> one, or Rocky. Rocky ended up being 199, but if I knew then what I know
> now, I would have made Rocky 200. That was the coolest cache container we
> have ever seen geocaching.
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 21:24:48 -0700
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> From: Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Congratulations on #200!
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> --=====================_352013829==_.ALT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 06:39 PM 1/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Another Tucson team would like to add our congratulations! Way to go
> >Scott and Ann, aka Team My Blue Heaven.
> >
> >Gregg and Maureen, MO & GO
>
> Thanks. Even though we were the first Tucson based team to reach both 100
> and 200, something tells me that you two might be the first to 300. :-)
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
>
> --=====================_352013829==_.ALT
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
>
> <html>
> At 06:39 PM 1/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:<br><br>
> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Another Tucson team would like to
> add our congratulations! Way to go Scott and Ann, aka <b>Team My
> Blue Heaven</b>. <br><br>
> Gregg and Maureen, MO & GO</blockquote><br>
> Thanks. Even though we were the first Tucson based team to reach
> both 100 and 200, something tells me that you two might be the first to
> 300. :-)<br><br>
> <br>
> <div>In liberty,</div>
> <br>
> <div>Scott</div>
> <br>
> <div>wood@myblueheaven.com</div>
> <div><a href="http://www.myblueheaven.com/"
EUDORA=AUTOURL>www.myblueheaven.com</a></div>
> </html>
>
> --=====================_352013829==_.ALT--
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
> End of Az-Geocaching Digest