[Az-Geocaching] Re:No finds.

[Marc]

Some cachers, like us, have had the luxury of mentors to help us get to 
know the ropes. I know from e-mails and logs that I have had on my 
caches that not all do. I think we have all been good about educating 
them on what to do, but if they don't belong to this forum or make 
contact with other cachers, they simply will not know. Once I had a 
cacher click the "archive this cache" cause they could not find it. As 
it turned out, they had no idea what that really meant. After I e-mailed 
them back asking they why, they realized the cache was really there and 
they just missed it, and now know how to properly log.

As a cache owner, I have made it a point to respond back to each e-mail 
or log entry that needs attention. I figure if they are courteous enough 
to contact me, I should help support and encourage them to continue 
doing it for others. I have found it very helpful to know  when a 
problem may exist. I can then go check on my cache and make sure all is 
well and let them know the status. If some contact is not made, then how 
can we expect cache owners to keep there caches in good shape.

As far as cachers that don't log a note, no find, or contact the cache 
owner, on caches that they don't think they spend enough time doing, 
they are not allowing the cache owner the knowledge that someone is 
interested in finding their cache. Some cachers do and I think that is 
great! I make sure that the cache is there and in good shape for them. I 
think this helps increase the over all caching experience for all.

Tamo's Clan'Destiny

Aus Dem Kasten wrote:

>	As a cache owner I just like to be informed if someone has made
>an effort to find the cache and did not succeed.  
>	Team Seeking posted a "no-find" on one of our caches, and when I
>checked on it, the container was in fact missing.  I found out later
>that another team had tried to locate it, but never logged the "no-find"
>or posted a note.  This was a bit frustrating.  If this team had taken
>the time to do so, Team Seeking wouldn't have wasted time trying to
>locate something that was not there.
>	If teams, for some reason, would rather post a note than log a
>"no-find", I'm all for it. It really does not bother me if it is logged
>as a "no-find" or posted as a note.  As long as the cache owner and
>caching community are made aware.
>
>Aus Dem Kasten
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Pat
>Thompson
>Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 1:27 PM
>To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Re:No finds.
>
>We have had the experience of logging one "No Find". We posted the "No 
>Find" on the internet log site and then advised the cache owner by 
>e-mail of some specific facts regarding our search, so that he/she could
>
>determine whether the cache was actually missing or we had just missed 
>finding it. The cache owner promptly visited the site and determined 
>that the cache was missing. He/she responsibly alerted the geocaching 
>community and disabled the cache until he was able to replace it, which 
>he did in a very short period of time.
>
>In my view there are two kinds of "No Finds": 1.The cache actually 
>exists and isn't found 2.The cache has been stolen, lost etc. and no 
>amount of hunting is going to find it.
>
>In the case of number 2., reporting this kind of "No Find" actually 
>renders a service to the geocaching community for reasons that I assume 
>are obvious. Therefore, I would actually classify this type of "No Find"
>
>as a pseudo "No Find" in the sense that there was nothing to find in the
>
>first place. I find that I am a little uncomfortable recording a "No 
>Find" for a cache that is impossible to find because it doesn't exist. 
>Once it has been verified that the cache doesn't exist, then it is my 
>view that the person who reported it should be entitled to  delete the 
>"No Find" from his/her log.
>
>However, I also believe that there is some historical and practical 
>value attached to maintaining an accurate search log. For that reason, 
>the log history would record that on a particular date the cache was 
>found to be missing and subsequently disabled and/or archived or 
>replaced. This would only occur, if the owner verified that the cache 
>was actually missing.
>
>I recognize that these are really minor points on the relative scale of 
>priority issues, but maybe they are worth considering in the interest of
>
>establishing that there is a real distinction between the two types of 
>"No Finds" cited above. On the other hand, maybe everybody is happy with
>
>the current protocol and feels that, in this case, making this 
>distinction with a difference would serve no useful purpose.
>
>Either way, we have enjoyed geocaching and thank all those in the 
>geocaching community who make possible such an enjoyable pastime.
>
>Team Seeking
>Pat & Jan Thompson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Team Seeking
>Pat Thompson
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>  
>