[Az-Geocaching] Just wondering, please no fighting
Bill
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:16:35 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3000B.0CF30800
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for this explanation. In our only cache that we have placed =
(Sulpher Springs Valley) which is at:
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D26471
we rated the terrain at two stars. It is on flat ground, with just some =
low weeds/small bushes maybe a foot tall which can be easily walked =
around, and you can park 20' away. However, if it has rained recently =
the ground would possibly be soft enough to present a problem for =
wheelchairs and crutch tips. In addition, the cache itself is back =
under a low mesquite, and that could present a problem for some people. =
As a result, we didn't feel we could give it a one star terrain rating. =
We did spend quite a bit of time thinking about this before we made up =
our mind, and we still aren't sure we did it right. On the one hand, we =
didn't want to discourage those who would manage it with no difficulty, =
and on the other hand, we didn't want to lure someone all the way out =
here only to have them find we had misrated it.
Bill
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Andrew Ayre=20
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com=20
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Just wondering, please no fighting
Well its quite simple really. The current system (1 star) is IMO =
inadequate because is relies on the hider knowing what "handicap =
accessible" really means, and lets face it - most people don't have a =
clue. If you go to the clayjar cache rating sysem thingmyjig, it =
describes 1 star as being wheelchair accessible. This is a perfect =
example IMO of someone writing an attempt at a handicap description and =
not having a clue. People in wheelchairs can often go further and longer =
than someone on crutches. IMO its a crude attempt at finding the "lowest =
common denominator".
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3000B.0CF30800
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2723.2500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>Thanks for this =
explanation. In=20
our only cache that we have placed (Sulpher Springs Valley) which is=20
at:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D26471">htt=
p://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D26471</A></FONT></DIV=
>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>we rated the terrain at =
two=20
stars. It is on flat ground, with just some low weeds/small bushes =
maybe a=20
foot tall which can be easily walked around, and you can park 20' =
away. =20
However, if it has rained recently the ground would possibly be soft =
enough to=20
present a problem for wheelchairs and crutch tips. In addition, =
the cache=20
itself is back under a low mesquite, and that could present a problem =
for some=20
people. As a result, we didn't feel we could give it a one star =
terrain=20
rating. We did spend quite a bit of time thinking about this =
before we=20
made up our mind, and we still aren't sure we did it right. On the =
one=20
hand, we didn't want to discourage those who would manage it with no =
difficulty,=20
and on the other hand, we didn't want to lure someone all the way out =
here only=20
to have them find we had misrated it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>Bill</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dandy@britishideas.com =
href=3D"mailto:andy@britishideas.com">Andrew=20
Ayre</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlistserv@azgeocaching.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, April 11, 2003 =
8:30=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Az-Geocaching] =
Just=20
wondering, please no fighting</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D731321415-11042003>Well=20
its quite simple really. The current system (1 star) is IMO inadequate =
because=20
is relies on the hider knowing what "handicap accessible" really =
means, and=20
lets face it - most people don't have a clue. If you go to the clayjar =
cache=20
rating sysem thingmyjig, it describes 1 star as being wheelchair =
accessible.=20
This is a perfect example IMO of someone writing an attempt at a =
handicap=20
description and not having a clue. People in wheelchairs can often go =
further=20
and longer than someone on crutches. IMO its a crude attempt at =
finding the=20
"lowest common =
denominator".</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3000B.0CF30800--