[Az-Geocaching] 'can't find vs. 'note'...

[Scott Wood]

At 12:46 AM 2/24/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>Now, on 'Where Eagles Soar' (?name? - it's since been archived..), I did 
>post a 'note' after my first failed attempt, because I honestly thought 
>that it had been pilfered (lots of nosy neighbors were about!), and I had 
>looked right up to sunset (frustration! Damn sunset!). It was less a 'can't

I guess my point would be that even if you thought that the cache might 
have been pilfered it should still have been a "can't find."

I mentioned the one that I couldn't find out in California and it was the 
same way.  The place where the cache was supposed to be had been recently 
bulldozed.  I still looked around the area as well as we could considering 
that number of people in the park that day.  When I logged it I 
still  logged it as a couldn't find it because I couldn't.

I guess my point is that it is irrelevant if the cache has been pilfered or 
not.  To me it all depends on if I could find it or not.  The note should 
be for those times that I couldn't get to the area but tried.


In liberty,

Scott

wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com