Re: [Az-Geocaching] Another cache bites the dust

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ted Louis Glenn
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Another cache bites the dust
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Richard Hansen
<> wrote:
> Reading what Regan has posted, a geocache does not seem to fall in any category ... though "litter" would need a definition.


ARS 13-1601:
3. "Litter" includes any rubbish, refuse, waste material, offal,
paper, glass, cans, bottles, organic or inorganic trash, debris,
filthy or odoriferous objects, dead animals, or any foreign substance
of whatever kind or description, including junked or abandoned
vehicles, whether or not any of these items are of value.
--
Ted Louis Glenn (tlglenn AT gmail.com)
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Do not place my email address in a public place without my consent.