+1 for the listserv.
If controlling what is said in communication is relegated to a forum venue,
either someone would have to be there to play censor (would they be
objective?) and all posts moderated; or posts would get through that one
might have issue with and would later be moderated by someone, whose
objectivity at this point due to anonymity can be questioned, would
certainly be questioned. What if 99% of people who would have normally read
the post and saw nothing wrong with it, but it happened to be that 1% who
moderate the posts that had a problem with it?
The listserv has served well over the years, and I suspect the forums would
be used as much as geocrazed has been. No offense to the admins of that
forum, but it serves well to illustrate the point that a forum wouldn't do
well overall. On that note, geocrazed appears to be down and completely
wiped out at this point.
Brian
Team A.I.
DISCLAIMER:
This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail address or by calling the telephone number associated with this transmission. Please delete this e-mail from your computer (or discard this fax). Thank You.
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)