Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache database

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: George Harris
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache database
The comical part is that GC lets the cachers do all the work, including populating the online database, and then holds that information proprietary, and sells the output of a search script back to the cachers who did all the work. Well, that and the untrimmed full text of the user agreement shot to everyone's inbox.

Personally, I would use a list of 2000+ names to create a devious puzzle cache and put some expensive electronic gear in it to make people beat their brains out trying to solve it. But that's me.

----- Original Message -----
From: ShadowAce
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache database


I cannot answer that question, nor would I attempt to make a guess. I am interested on how a list of 2000+ names would be of any use, as the Names are not searchable for archived caches. Which means your then asking for the 2000+ GC numbers (without the names? or with? Cause now your getting to the information in a .LOC file which you also are not supposed to share.)

I would be real interested to see who, mostly new cachers, goes through the entire list of 2000+ archived caches in Arizona to read the 'history' when they have no information about the location of the cache to begin with.

You do what you have to do, I was simply stating I thought someone should let the new cachers know that sharing that dataset is a violation of the usage agreement and anything done beyond that is up to whomever.

Discussing it (ways to get around the terms of service agreement) on a multi state forum is the comical part of all this. :-)

-Dirk