Makes sense. I suppose then it could be submitted as a new cache with a
link built into the description for the old cache, but maybe call it by
the same name?
Brian
Team A.I.
ShadowAce wrote:
> Basically to drop all the other spam that this became....
>
> I would say this IMHO:
>
> New owner, New Cache, New Log. = New Cache
>
> Old Container, Old Log, New Owner = Reactivate.
>
> Since this cache is not the cache in question, it really is a new
> cache, new hide and as such deserves a new history.
>
> Thats my opinion and I like it, your feelings will vary.
>
> On 5/4/07, *Bob & Linda Smith* <Lrsmith@cableone.net
> <mailto:Lrsmith@cableone.net>> wrote:
>
> OK everyone, I need to find out why an archived cache can't be
> un-archived so the adopt program can be used. I am trying to get a
> cache back on line that the original owner can no longer maintain. I
> was told by Michael LaPaglia at GC.com that once a cache is
> archived it
> can not be un-archived. I am pretty sure that I read somewhere
> that a
> cache could be un-archived and brought back on line. If you want to
> look at the cache on line the way point is GCJWPV
>
>
> Bob and Linda Smith, Team Petite Elite
> Prescott, AZ
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/791 - Release Date: 5/6/2007 9:07 AM
>
(text/plain)