Re: [Az-Geocaching] Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M\Phil Dupré at <-
MMRegan Smith at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Regan Smith
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6
Actually if you read the logs of previous finders on the cache page you can
get an idea of the cache, here in the East Valley we have a plethora of
FTF'rs that help weed out the caches..and make sure the cords are accurate



-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Phil
Dupré
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:46 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6

Hi guys,

I think it would be wise to see who is the person that started the
geocache hunt before attending. If reputations are established then
it's easier to give credibility or lack of when deciding to attend
that hunt. Same thing as eBay sellers with their reputations. But I
guess it's hard to document the history of previous geocache hunts one
organized.

Phil
(http://www.everytrail.com)



On 2/11/07,
<> wrote:
> Send Az-Geocaching mailing list submissions to
>

>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>

>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>

>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Az-Geocaching digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Only an altoids tin!! (Jared Ross)
>    2. Re: Check this video out: "Bikini Thief" (AZcachemeister)
>    3. Re: Only an altoids tin!! (ShadowAce)
>    4. Re: Only an altoids tin!! (AZcachemeister)
>    5. Re: Only an altoids tin!! (AZcachemeister)
>    6. Re: Only an altoids tin!! (AZcachemeister)

>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:55:26 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jared Ross <>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> To:
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Clearly I've missed the mark on this one and then had the audacity to
argue with the king of statistics, Mr. DSW himself. Either way, apparently
this wasn't the direction that ShadowAce was referring to. I'll save my
comments for future discussions. I sometimes wonder how we can have such
ridiculously different opinions, and then I remember that we have
politicians that can't even agree. I wonder if anyone has ever been arrested
while finding a rural cache???
>
> Jared
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: noshdoo tsoh <>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:33:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <!--
>
> _filtered {font-family:Tahoma;
> panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
> _filtered {
> margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
> _filtered {font-family:Tahoma;
> panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
> _filtered {
> margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
>
>  _filtered {font-family:Tahoma;
> panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
> /* Style Definitions */
>  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
>         {margin:0in;
> margin-bottom:.0001pt;
> font-size:12.0pt;
> font-family:"Times New Roman";}
> a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
>         {color:blue;
> text-decoration:underline;}
> a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
>         {color:blue;
> text-decoration:underline;}
> pre
>         {margin:0in;
> margin-bottom:.0001pt;
> font-size:10.0pt;
> font-family:"Courier New";}
> span.emailstyle18
>         {font-family:Arial;
> color:navy;}
> span.emailstyle19
>         {font-family:Arial;
> color:navy;}
> span.emailstyle21
>         {font-family:Arial;
> color:navy;}
> span.EmailStyle22
>         {
> font-family:Arial;
> color:navy;}
>  _filtered {
> margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
> div.Section1
>         {}
> -->

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ?Trust me, just because there are
> more micros than rural caches, doesn't mean they're more POPULAR.?
>
>
>
>
>
> It?s not the number of caches that makes them popular,
> but the number of finds on each cache. The fact that they are found at a
rate
> exponentially higher than other caches does indicate popularity. Or am I
> missing the definition of ?popular?? Back it up with numbers? ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
> ?We're trying to encourage good
> micros and urban caches and discourage the placement of bad ones.?
>
>
>
>
>
> A noble cause, indeed. Can I see you?re scientific
> study on what is good and what is bad? You are the decider? Oh, that?s
> right, trust you.
>
>
>
>
>
> Back to you?re regularly scheduled rant?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
>
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
Jared Ross
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007
> 8:42 PM
>
> To:
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only
> an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, I knew that remark was coming.
> Trust me, just because there are more micros than rural caches, doesn't
mean
> they're more POPULAR. You conduct a scientific study and then I'll believe
that
> claim. Furthermore I do not believe mine (nor AZcachemeister or
ShadowAce's)
> comments were suggesting that we discourage micros, just crappy ones. :)
> Honestly, there are hundreds of great micros and urban hides out there. At
the
> same time, there are hundreds of horrible micros (apparently they're
popular).
> We're trying to encourage good micros and urban caches and discourage the
> placement of bad ones.
>
>
>
> As I mentioned we do our best to determine whether a cache is one that we
will
> enjoy or not before going after it, but this doesn't always work. Maybe if
I
> "complain" about it then the next guy with my tastes will know
> better.
>
>
>
> Cache and let cache, and let me complain about crappy caches. ;)
>
>
>
> Jared
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> ----
>
> From: noshdoo tsoh < >
>
> To:
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:57:05 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
>
> To no one in particular, and to whomever it applies:
>
>
>
>
>
> Urban micros are a lot more popular than
> rural/desert/mountain caches. Just because you personally don't like urban
> micro caches doesn't mean there needs to be some sort of organized effort
to
> discourage them. A lot of people are visiting and enjoying these types of
> caches. Really, how hard can it be to go after only the type of caches you
> enjoy, instead of going after all of them, and then complaining about it
later?
> You'll find duds no matter what type of cache you go after. And of course,
the
> whole thing's just a game. Sounds like a few cachers may need a vacation
from
> caching itself.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your trash cache is another?s treasure cache.
>
>
>
>
>
> Simple idea: Cache and let cache.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
>
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
Regan Smith
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007
> 1:15 PM
>
> To:
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only
> an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have a borrowed idea (360) don?t
> log it do you really need the find??? Regardless of what alphabet log you
> use a find on a cache validates it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
>
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
Jared Ross
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007
> 12:31 PM
>
> To:
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only
> an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> WARNING: This is a regular sized
> email. If you're only a fan of micro emails then ignore this email
immediately.
>
>
>
> I really agree with AZcachemeister and ShadowAce. At the same time
ShadowAce's
> comments have made me realize that I'm not doing much to help the matter.
I'm
> not very confrontational and I don't like to be very mean and while I
encourage
> someone with larger cohanes to log exactly how they feel, I'm not really
> willing to do that. I have however decided to change my logging standards.
> We've become a little more picky when it comes to caches that we hunt. I'm
not
> saying that we've sworn off micros or urban hides as there are some out
there
> that are nice. Basically if I'm planning a cache outing I'll read over the
> cache description and if it seems suspect I might skim through a few log
> entries. If it sounds like its behind a Home Depot trash compactor then
I'm
> going to take it off our list. Even with a screening process we still end
up
> doing caches that we would rather not have done. Sure we could have
ignored the
> cache, IF we would have known what we were getting into. Admit it, once
you're
> out of the car and searching, you want to find it.
>
>
>
> Yesterday I grabbed four urban caches. I also drove past about 2 or 3
others
> but never even stopped because of the locations. Of those 4, I logged as
> follows:
>
>
>
> Cache #1 - It was a tricky cache container in a relatively pointless
location
> but it belongs to a series and overall it wasn't that bad. My log entry
noted
> the creativity of the cache and thanked the owner.
>
>
>
> Cache #2 - A LPC cache located close to a main road and across from an
office
> building. Luckily I could block the traffic with my truck but the
container was
> too big and made the lamp skirt stick up on one side, making it that much
more
> obvious. My log entry said almost nothing, "yup, right where it should
> have been" and instead of signing off the way I always do "Thanks,
> Jared" I wrote "TN/LN, Jared". It's subtle, I know.
>
>
>
> Cache #3 - A good cache with a significant location. The container was
nothing
> special and the technique was typical, but the location wasn't. My log
entry
> was long, very detailed (without spoilers) and included a Thank You at the
end.
>
>
>
> Cache #4 - A creative, homemade container in a vagabonds paradise. There
were
> blankets and other things very nearby that indicate homeless people are
usually
> here. My log briefly mentioned the cache container being unique and then I
> described the homeless persons new "shelter" nearby. I did not thank
> the cache owners.
>
>
>
> This morning I found another urban cache that while not in an especially
> interesting spot, it was a well planned hide and well stocked, large,
cache. I
> also left a very long detailed log entry for this cache expressing my
enjoyment
> of finding it.
>
>
>
> AZcachemeister is right that we need to find a way to increase the quality
of
> urban caches. Urban hides have a place in geocaching and allow for many
people
> to enjoy the game that might not be able to find the rural hides. Helping
each
> other make better decisions about what caches to go after is one thing
that we
> can do to help. While my way isn't blunt and to the point, I'm trying to
praise
> good caches by leaving detailed log entries and ignore bad caches by not
giving
> them the praise they DON'T deserve.
>
>
>
> Another, more obvious way of making a difference is by hiding our own
caches.
> I'm not very good at this and often struggle to justify my cache
placements
> because I either think they aren't creative enough or I question whether
or not
> the location is good enough. From what I've seen lately though I would
rather
> find an altoids container in a park than find a well disguised cache
behind
> Wal-Mart.
>
>
>
> Quickly, in regards to the concern about having your log entry deleted if
you
> leave negative feedback. You have a couple options.
>
> 1. You could keep logging the same message back to the cache every time it
is
> deleted making a note that it was deleted. If anyone is watching the cache
> they'll become aware of the situation and maybe that will affect their
next
> cache placement.
>
> 2. You could log a seemingly innocent log entry and then a day or two
later
> edit that log entry and add back the comments in your original log that
was
> deleted. Owners aren't notified when a log entry is edited.
>
> 3. While this one is controversial some people do it. If your log entry is
> repeatedly deleted then log a find on your own cache and specify that it
is a
> log entry for GCxxxxx and the reason you can't log it there followed by
your
> original log entry.
>
>
>
> Anyone else have any ideas or comments on how we can improve the caches in
our
> state? Maybe we need a special acronym. Instead of TFTC we could have DWYT
> (Don't Waste Your Time). Of course we could always start using this
website to
> generate log entries for us:
http://loungingatwalden.googlepages.com/RandomLog.html
>
> My favorite generated log entry: "This cache was ill-conceived and
> ill-received. You should turn your GPS over to the nearest authorities!
TNLN
> and almost didn't bother signing the log!!"
>
>
>
> Jared of AZBliss02
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> From: AZcachemeister <>
>
> To:
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:17:52 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
> Well, I don't like to insult people by saying their cache is crap, but
aren't
> they insulting us by bringing us to those areas?
>
> There is nothing of interest at the back of the 99? store, nor anything
clever
> about a shoe-polish can stuffed in a crack in the building.
>
> If we don't start taking some responsibility for our activities, someone
else
> will.
>
> If enough people start 'telling it like it is' then the cachers hiding
those
> type of caches just might get the hint.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regan Smith wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Tftc
>
>
>
>
>
> Tnlnsl
>
>
>
>
>
> Honesty will get your log deleted?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
ShadowAce
>
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007
> 6:15 PM
>
> To:
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only
> an altoids tin!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Scott,
>
>
>
> With all due respect. Oct 25, 2005 4:02 PM you sent email about how
> Micros were evil and now that you had finally reached the top find counter
in
> the state you were not going to be going for micros any longer. How only
Urban
> caches had any reason to exist and people should help stop the spread of
micro
> spew.
>
>
>
> Yet a very large percent of your cache finds are micros even after the
> posts about how Micros should go away. 1114
> terrain 1 and 735 difficulty 1
> according to the stats you placed on your profile. While I am sick of
> lamp poles and guard rails myself, I merely pointed that story out because
of
> how many people caching in Arizona
> tell me at almost every single event 'Permission is not required' or 'Its
> public property'.
>
>
>
> If cachers want to place a micro every 600 feet they will. If they throw
> caches out with no intention of ever maintaining them, they will. Why?
Because
> every other cacher is writing 'Great cache, thanks for the hide' and not
> writing....
>
>
>
> I was able to grab this cache quickly though
> I had to shield the location with my rear side from the dumpster divers.
> or After sifting through the garbage left by
> the homeless in the area, we found your cache.
>
>
>
> Never would have known about this
> place, because we generally avoid dumpsters.
>
>
>
> I have been trying to be very honest in my logs about areas
> such as these and instead of getting 'Hay thanks for warning me that place
was
> going to be so terrible', I receive emails saying 'Why are you such an
ass? If
> you dont like the cache, dont go find it!'
>
>
>
> Welp the problem with this is from the writeups you have no idea if it
> will be a real interesting place such as the one we found last night
called
> Hope, or in a pile of trash until you get to the location.
>
>
>
> So instead of complaining about the TYPE of cache, I was merely pointing
> out that Permission should be obtained on ALL cache hides. Heck I spent 2
years
> getting permission for one place. 4 weeks to get permission for another
cache.
> 5 weeks of emails to get permission for one location and then other people
just
> throw more caches in the area when they came.. Yep I caught hell from the
> person that granted me permission to place mine after that.. Joy joy...
>
>
>
> If people hate micros so much, why do they continue to grab them and
> write 'Thanks for the fun'?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/9/07, Roping
> The Wind <>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The geocacher who placed the altoid tin says he "wished others had told
> him
>
> this was not a good place to put a cache". I can only laugh at that
>
> statement. The gc.com site clearly
> states that you must get permission to
>
> place a cache on private property!!! Did he not read that little tidbit of
>
> information? Typical of alot of urban cache hides. Is he now trying to put
>
> it onto the geocaching community as a whole? Making the whole
game/community
>
> look bad?
>
>
>
> I do agree though that law enforcement over reacted... kinda like the
little
>
> Boston cartoon
> 'bomb' scare thing.
>
>
>
> The other thing that comes to my mind is that he is relatively new to the
>
> game and this is most of what he has seen so far... a bunch of altoid tins
>
> behind stores and on electrical boxes and the like. So, he might have
>
> thought it was totally ok to hide a cache like this... even though, as I
>
> mentioned before, he should have gotten permission to place it in the
first
>
> place.
>
>
>
> I do like this quote though: "I've discovered that I really don't like
> urban
>
> caching. I'd rather do it in the woods. That's where it's really fun," he
>
> said.
>
>
>
> As of the past month and a half now, I have not found an urban cache hide.
I
>
> dont mind going a week without finding a cache anymore. But I have decided
>
> that I only want to do rural area caches. Caches that require a hike to
get
>
> to or maybe a nice 4x4 drive or maybe just a drive by cache placed in a
>
> beautiful location way outside the city limit signs. Or maybe caches
placed
>
> in small towns is ok too. Basically, caches placed with the location in
>
> mind. I have been using the DGP geocaching site lately to pick and choose
>
> caches to find.
>
>
>
> The past month or so, I have found a much greater enjoyement for the game
>
> again. It feels like the old days of caching 4 or 5 years ago when I first
>
> began. I can't say I will never find an urban cache again. But I am
>
> carefully picking and choosing which ones I want to find.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> Team Ropingthewind
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>
> Laugh, share and connect with Windows Live Messenger
>
>
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://ima
gine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
>
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>
>
> Arizona 's
> Geocaching Resource
>
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>
>
>
>
>
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
>
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>
>
> Arizona 's
> Geocaching Resource
>
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Don't pick lemons.
>
> See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
>
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>
>
> Arizona 's
> Geocaching Resource
>
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No need to miss a message. Get
> email on-the-go
>
> with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile .
> Get
> started.
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
________
> It's here! Your new message!
> Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/2007021
0/7fc79cdf/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:41:14 -0700
> From: AZcachemeister <>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Check this video out: "Bikini Thief"
> To:
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I didn't view the entire video, but I believe the girl was distracting
> the store employees while her partner went for the micro hidden near the
> front door of the store (private property, no permission). This clearly
> ties in with the current major discussion about poorly hidden micros.
>
> Michael Dumroese wrote:
> > And why is this being posted on the list?
> >
> >
> > myke85268
> >
> >
> >     ----- Original Message -----
> >     *From:* Mark <mailto:highwayhavoc@yahoo.com>
> >     *To:* 
> >     <mailto:az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
> >     *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:16 PM
> >     *Subject:* [Az-Geocaching] Check this video out: "Bikini Thief"

> >
> >
> >     [http://www.mojoflix.com/] <http://www.mojoflix.com/>

> >
> >     [http://www.mojoflix.com/Video/Bikini-Thief.html]
> >     <http://www.mojoflix.com/Video/Bikini-Thief.html>

> >
> >       *Mark says: "Check this video out!"*

> >
> >
> >     *Click here to take a look!*
> >     <http://www.mojoflix.com/Video/Bikini-Thief.html>
> >     *Have a video of your own?
> >     _Share it_ <http://www.mojoflix.com/VideoUpload> at MojoFlix.com,
> >     and we'll even automatically convert it to work on your mobile
> >     phone, iPod Video or PSP!*

> >
> >     ____________________________________________________________
> >     Az-Geocaching mailing list 
> >     <mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> >     To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> >     http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

> >
> >     Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> >     http://www.azgeocaching.com

> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/2007021
1/da67607e/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:44:23 -0700
> From: ShadowAce <>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> To: 
> Message-ID:
>         <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

>
> :-)
>
> No problems Jared..
>
> I feel your pain, really I do.. :-)
>
> On 2/11/07, Jared Ross <> wrote:
> >
> > Clearly I've missed the mark on this one and then had the audacity to
> > argue with the king of statistics, Mr. DSW himself. Either way,
apparently
> > this wasn't the direction that ShadowAce was referring to. I'll save my
> > comments for future discussions. I sometimes wonder how we can have such
> > ridiculously different opinions, and then I remember that we have
> > politicians that can't even agree. I wonder if anyone has ever been
arrested
> > while finding a rural cache???
> >
> > Jared
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: noshdoo tsoh <>
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:33:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> > *"Trust me, just because there are more micros than rural caches,
doesn't
> > mean they're more POPULAR."*
> >
> >
> >
> > It's not the number of caches that makes them popular, but the number of
> > finds on each cache. The fact that they are found at a rate
exponentially
> > higher than other caches does indicate popularity. Or am I missing the
> > definition of 'popular'? Back it up with numbers? ;-)
> >
> > * *
> >
> > *"We're trying to encourage good micros and urban caches and discourage
> > the placement of bad ones."*
> >
> >
> >
> > A noble cause, indeed. Can I see you're scientific study on what is good
> > and what is bad? You are the decider? Oh, that's right, *trust you*.
> >
> >
> >
> > Back to you're regularly scheduled rant?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* [mailto:
> > ] *On Behalf Of *Jared
Ross
> > *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:42 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I knew that remark was coming. Trust me, just because there are
more
> > micros than rural caches, doesn't mean they're more POPULAR. You conduct
a
> > scientific study and then I'll believe that claim. Furthermore I do not
> > believe mine (nor AZcachemeister or ShadowAce's) comments were
suggesting
> > that we discourage micros, just crappy ones. :) Honestly, there are
hundreds
> > of great micros and urban hides out there. At the same time, there are
> > hundreds of horrible micros (apparently they're popular). We're trying
to
> > encourage good micros and urban caches and discourage the placement of
bad
> > ones.
> >
> > As I mentioned we do our best to determine whether a cache is one that
we
> > will enjoy or not before going after it, but this doesn't always work.
Maybe
> > if I "complain" about it then the next guy with my tastes will know
better.
> >
> > Cache and let cache, and let me complain about crappy caches. ;)
> >
> > Jared
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: noshdoo tsoh < >
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:57:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> > To no one in particular, and to whomever it applies:
> >
> >
> >
> > Urban micros are a lot more popular than rural/desert/mountain caches.
> > Just because you personally don't like urban micro caches doesn't mean
there
> > needs to be some sort of organized effort to discourage them. A lot of
> > people are visiting and enjoying these types of caches. Really, how hard
can
> > it be to go after only the type of caches you enjoy, instead of going
after
> > all of them, and then complaining about it later? You'll find duds no
matter
> > what type of cache you go after. And of course, the whole thing's just a
> > game. Sounds like a few cachers may need a vacation from caching itself.
> >
> >
> >
> > Your trash cache is another's treasure cache.
> >
> >
> >
> > Simple idea: Cache and let cache.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* [mailto:
> > ] *On Behalf Of *Regan
> > Smith
> > *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:15 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a borrowed idea (360) don't log it do you really need the find???
> > Regardless of what alphabet log you use a find on a cache validates it.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* [mailto:
> > ] *On Behalf Of *Jared
Ross
> > *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 12:31 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > WARNING: This is a regular sized email. If you're only a fan of micro
> > emails then ignore this email immediately.
> >
> > I really agree with AZcachemeister and ShadowAce. At the same time
> > ShadowAce's comments have made me realize that I'm not doing much to
help
> > the matter. I'm not very confrontational and I don't like to be very
mean
> > and while I encourage someone with larger cohanes to log exactly how
they
> > feel, I'm not really willing to do that. I have however decided to
change my
> > logging standards. We've become a little more picky when it comes to
caches
> > that we hunt. I'm not saying that we've sworn off micros or urban hides
as
> > there are some out there that are nice. Basically if I'm planning a
cache
> > outing I'll read over the cache description and if it seems suspect I
might
> > skim through a few log entries. If it sounds like its behind a Home
Depot
> > trash compactor then I'm going to take it off our list. Even with a
> > screening process we still end up doing caches that we would rather not
have
> > done. Sure we could have ignored the cache, IF we would have known what
we
> > were getting into. Admit it, once you're out of the car and searching,
you
> > want to find it.
> >
> > Yesterday I grabbed four urban caches. I also drove past about 2 or 3
> > others but never even stopped because of the locations. Of those 4, I
logged
> > as follows:
> >
> > Cache #1 - It was a tricky cache container in a relatively pointless
> > location but it belongs to a series and overall it wasn't that bad. My
log
> > entry noted the creativity of the cache and thanked the owner.
> >
> > Cache #2 - A LPC cache located close to a main road and across from an
> > office building. Luckily I could block the traffic with my truck but the
> > container was too big and made the lamp skirt stick up on one side,
making
> > it that much more obvious. My log entry said almost nothing, "yup, right
> > where it should have been" and instead of signing off the way I always
do
> > "Thanks, Jared" I wrote "TN/LN, Jared". It's subtle, I know.
> >
> > Cache #3 - A good cache with a significant location. The container was
> > nothing special and the technique was typical, but the location wasn't.
My
> > log entry was long, very detailed (without spoilers) and included a
Thank
> > You at the end.
> >
> > Cache #4 - A creative, homemade container in a vagabonds paradise. There
> > were blankets and other things very nearby that indicate homeless people
are
> > usually here. My log briefly mentioned the cache container being unique
and
> > then I described the homeless persons new "shelter" nearby. I did not
thank
> > the cache owners.
> >
> > This morning I found another urban cache that while not in an especially
> > interesting spot, it was a well planned hide and well stocked, large,
cache.
> > I also left a very long detailed log entry for this cache expressing my
> > enjoyment of finding it.
> >
> > AZcachemeister is right that we need to find a way to increase the
quality
> > of urban caches. Urban hides have a place in geocaching and allow for
many
> > people to enjoy the game that might not be able to find the rural hides.
> > Helping each other make better decisions about what caches to go after
is
> > one thing that we can do to help. While my way isn't blunt and to the
point,
> > I'm trying to praise good caches by leaving detailed log entries and
ignore
> > bad caches by not giving them the praise they DON'T deserve.
> >
> > Another, more obvious way of making a difference is by hiding our own
> > caches. I'm not very good at this and often struggle to justify my cache
> > placements because I either think they aren't creative enough or I
question
> > whether or not the location is good enough. From what I've seen lately
> > though I would rather find an altoids container in a park than find a
well
> > disguised cache behind Wal-Mart.
> >
> > Quickly, in regards to the concern about having your log entry deleted
if
> > you leave negative feedback. You have a couple options.
> > 1. You could keep logging the same message back to the cache every time
it
> > is deleted making a note that it was deleted. If anyone is watching the
> > cache they'll become aware of the situation and maybe that will affect
their
> > next cache placement.
> > 2. You could log a seemingly innocent log entry and then a day or two
> > later edit that log entry and add back the comments in your original log
> > that was deleted. Owners aren't notified when a log entry is edited.
> > 3. While this one is controversial some people do it. If your log entry
is
> > repeatedly deleted then log a find on your own cache and specify that it
is
> > a log entry for GCxxxxx and the reason you can't log it there followed
by
> > your original log entry.
> >
> > Anyone else have any ideas or comments on how we can improve the caches
in
> > our state? Maybe we need a special acronym. Instead of TFTC we could
have
> > DWYT (Don't Waste Your Time). Of course we could always start using this
> > website to generate log entries for us:
> > http://loungingatwalden.googlepages.com/RandomLog.html
> > My favorite generated log entry: "This cache was ill-conceived and
> > ill-received. You should turn your GPS over to the nearest authorities!
TNLN
> > and almost didn't bother signing the log!!"
> >
> > Jared of AZBliss02
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: AZcachemeister <>
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:17:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> > Well, I don't like to insult people by saying their cache is crap, but
> > aren't they insulting us by bringing us to those areas?
> > There is nothing of interest at the back of the 99? store, nor anything
> > clever about a shoe-polish can stuffed in a crack in the building.
> > If we don't start taking some responsibility for our activities, someone
> > else will.
> > If enough people start 'telling it like it is' then the cachers hiding
> > those type of caches just might get the hint.
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Regan Smith wrote:
> >
> > Tftc
> >
> >
> >
> > Tnlnsl
> >
> >
> >
> > Honesty will get your log deleted?
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* [
> >
mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com<az-geocaching-bounces
@listserv.azgeocaching.com>]
> > *On Behalf Of *ShadowAce
> > *Sent:* Friday, February 09, 2007 6:15 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > With all due respect. Oct 25, 2005 4:02 PM you sent email about how
> > Micros were evil and now that you had finally reached the top find
counter
> > in the state you were not going to be going for micros any longer. How
only
> > Urban caches had any reason to exist and people should help stop the
spread
> > of micro spew.
> >
> > Yet a very large percent of your cache finds are micros even after the
> > posts about how Micros should go away. 1114 terrain 1 and 735 difficulty
1
> > according to the stats you placed on your profile. While I am sick of
lamp
> > poles and guard rails myself, I merely pointed that story out because of
how
> > many people caching in Arizona tell me at almost every single event
> > 'Permission is not required' or 'Its public property'.
> >
> > If cachers want to place a micro every 600 feet they will. If they
throw
> > caches out with no intention of ever maintaining them, they will. Why?
> > Because every other cacher is writing 'Great cache, thanks for the hide'
and
> > not writing....
> >
> > *I was able to grab this cache quickly though I had to shield the
location
> > with my rear side from the dumpster divers.* or *After sifting through
the
> > garbage left by the homeless in the area, we found your cache. *
> >
> > *Never would have known about this place, because we generally avoid
> > dumpsters.
> >
> > * I have been trying to be very honest in my logs about areas such as
> > these and instead of getting 'Hay thanks for warning me that place was
going
> > to be so terrible', I receive emails saying 'Why are you such an ass? If
you
> > dont like the cache, dont go find it!'
> >
> > Welp the problem with this is from the writeups you have no idea if it
> > will be a real interesting place such as the one we found last night
called
> > Hope, or in a pile of trash until you get to the location.
> >
> > So instead of complaining about the TYPE of cache, I was merely
pointing
> > out that Permission should be obtained on ALL cache hides. Heck I spent
2
> > years getting permission for one place. 4 weeks to get permission for
> > another cache. 5 weeks of emails to get permission for one location and
then
> > other people just throw more caches in the area when they came.. Yep I
> > caught hell from the person that granted me permission to place mine
after
> > that.. Joy joy...
> >
> > If people hate micros so much, why do they continue to grab them and
> > write 'Thanks for the fun'?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/9/07, *Roping The Wind* <> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The geocacher who placed the altoid tin says he "wished others had told
> > him
> > this was not a good place to put a cache". I can only laugh at that
> > statement. The gc.com site clearly states that you must get permission
to
> > place a cache on private property!!! Did he not read that little tidbit
of
> > information? Typical of alot of urban cache hides. Is he now trying to
put
> > it onto the geocaching community as a whole? Making the whole
> > game/community
> > look bad?
> >
> > I do agree though that law enforcement over reacted... kinda like the
> > little
> > Boston cartoon 'bomb' scare thing.
> >
> > The other thing that comes to my mind is that he is relatively new to
the
> > game and this is most of what he has seen so far... a bunch of altoid
tins
> > behind stores and on electrical boxes and the like. So, he might have
> > thought it was totally ok to hide a cache like this... even though, as I
> > mentioned before, he should have gotten permission to place it in the
> > first
> > place.
> >
> > I do like this quote though: "I've discovered that I really don't like
> > urban
> > caching. I'd rather do it in the woods. That's where it's really fun,"
he
> > said.
> >
> > As of the past month and a half now, I have not found an urban cache
hide.
> > I
> > dont mind going a week without finding a cache anymore. But I have
decided
> > that I only want to do rural area caches. Caches that require a hike to
> > get
> > to or maybe a nice 4x4 drive or maybe just a drive by cache placed in a
> > beautiful location way outside the city limit signs. Or maybe caches
> > placed
> > in small towns is ok too. Basically, caches placed with the location in
> > mind. I have been using the DGP geocaching site lately to pick and
choose
> > caches to find.
> >
> > The past month or so, I have found a much greater enjoyement for the
game
> > again. It feels like the old days of caching 4 or 5 years ago when I
first
> >
> > began. I can't say I will never find an urban cache again. But I am
> > carefully picking and choosing which ones I want to find.
> >
> > Scott
> > Team Ropingthewind
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Laugh, share and connect with Windows Live Messenger
> >
> >
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://ima
gine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Don't pick lemons.
> > See all the new 2007
cars<http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE0OGRsc3F2BF9TAzk3MTA3M
Dc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3Y2Fycw-->at Yahoo!
> >
Autos.<http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE0OGRsc3F2BF9TAzk3MTA
3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3Y2Fycw-->
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
> > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/mail%0a>
> > with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile . Get
started.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/mail%0a>
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Looking for earth-friendly autos?
> > Browse Top Cars by "Green
Rating"<http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MT
A3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI->at Yahoo! Autos' Green
Center.
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/2007021
1/59bd152b/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:19:12 -0700
> From: AZcachemeister <>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> To:
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> While I really don't care for another lamp-pole-skirt or such, they
> really don't bother me as much as the ones attached to the back of a
> private business...on the downspout, the dumpster enclosure, the
> electric meter cabinet. Apparently the whole thrill here */is/* to /'get
> away with it'/ and not get caught by the store manager or a patrolling
> police officer.
>
> As I see it, one of the big problems is that as these types of hides
> (both the simply monotimeous ones, and the blatant trespassing ones)
> increase, new cachers get the idea that these are normal, acceptable
> ways to hide, and so that is what they do when they run out and hide
> /their/ new ones. Thus the 'problem' continues to increase.
>
> Yes, plenty of cachers get arrested (or at least questioned) while
> caching in rural areas. I would think, however, you're more likely to
> have a confrontation with an irritated property owner who just happens
> to own a 12 Gauge, long before the Sheriff even gets there.
>
> Jared Ross wrote:
> > Clearly I've missed the mark on this one and then had the audacity to
> > argue with the king of statistics, Mr. DSW himself. Either way,
> > apparently this wasn't the direction that ShadowAce was referring to.
> > I'll save my comments for future discussions. I sometimes wonder how
> > we can have such ridiculously different opinions, and then I remember
> > that we have politicians that can't even agree. I wonder if anyone has
> > ever been arrested while finding a rural cache???
> >
> > Jared
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: noshdoo tsoh <>
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:33:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> > /"Trust me, just because there are more micros than rural caches,
> > doesn't mean they're more POPULAR."/
> >
> >
> >
> > It's not the number of caches that makes them popular, but the number
> > of finds on each cache. The fact that they are found at a rate
> > exponentially higher than other caches does indicate popularity. Or am
> > I missing the definition of 'popular'? Back it up with numbers? ;-)
> >
> > / /
> >
> > /"We're trying to encourage good micros and urban caches and
> > discourage the placement of bad ones."/
> >
> >
> >
> > A noble cause, indeed. Can I see you're scientific study on what is
> > good and what is bad? You are the decider? Oh, that's right, */trust
> > you/*.
> >
> >
> >
> > Back to you're regularly scheduled rant...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > *From:*
> > [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] *On Behalf Of
> > *Jared Ross
> > *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:42 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I knew that remark was coming. Trust me, just because there are
> > more micros than rural caches, doesn't mean they're more POPULAR. You
> > conduct a scientific study and then I'll believe that claim.
> > Furthermore I do not believe mine (nor AZcachemeister or ShadowAce's)
> > comments were suggesting that we discourage micros, just crappy ones.
> > :) Honestly, there are hundreds of great micros and urban hides out
> > there. At the same time, there are hundreds of horrible micros
> > (apparently they're popular). We're trying to encourage good micros
> > and urban caches and discourage the placement of bad ones.
> >
> > As I mentioned we do our best to determine whether a cache is one that
> > we will enjoy or not before going after it, but this doesn't always
> > work. Maybe if I "complain" about it then the next guy with my tastes
> > will know better.
> >
> > Cache and let cache, and let me complain about crappy caches. ;)
> >
> > Jared
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: noshdoo tsoh < >
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:57:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> > To no one in particular, and to whomever it applies:
> >
> >
> >
> > Urban micros are a lot more popular than rural/desert/mountain caches.
> > Just because you personally don't like urban micro caches doesn't mean
> > there needs to be some sort of organized effort to discourage them. A
> > lot of people are visiting and enjoying these types of caches. Really,
> > how hard can it be to go after only the type of caches you enjoy,
> > instead of going after all of them, and then complaining about it
> > later? You'll find duds no matter what type of cache you go after. And
> > of course, the whole thing's just a game. Sounds like a few cachers
> > may need a vacation from caching itself.
> >
> >
> >
> > Your trash cache is another's treasure cache.
> >
> >
> >
> > Simple idea: Cache and let cache.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > *From:*
> > [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] *On Behalf Of
> > *Regan Smith
> > *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:15 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a borrowed idea (360) don't log it do you really need the
> > find??? Regardless of what alphabet log you use a find on a cache
> > validates it.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > *From:*
> > [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] *On Behalf Of
> > *Jared Ross
> > *Sent:* Saturday, February 10, 2007 12:31 PM
> > *To:*
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > WARNING: This is a regular sized email. If you're only a fan of micro
> > emails then ignore this email immediately.
> >
> > I really agree with AZcachemeister and ShadowAce. At the same time
> > ShadowAce's comments have made me realize that I'm not doing much to
> > help the matter. I'm not very confrontational and I don't like to be
> > very mean and while I encourage someone with larger cohanes to log
> > exactly how they feel, I'm not really willing to do that. I have
> > however decided to change my logging standards. We've become a little
> > more picky when it comes to caches that we hunt. I'm not saying that
> > we've sworn off micros or urban hides as there are some out there that
> > are nice. Basically if I'm planning a cache outing I'll read over the
> > cache description and if it seems suspect I might skim through a few
> > log entries. If it sounds like its behind a Home Depot trash compactor
> > then I'm going to take it off our list. Even with a screening process
> > we still end up doing caches that we would rather not have done. Sure
> > we could have ignored the cache, IF we would have known what we were
> > getting into. Admit it, once you're out of the car and searching, you
> > want to find it.
> >
> > Yesterday I grabbed four urban caches. I also drove past about 2 or 3
> > others but never even stopped because of the locations. Of those 4, I
> > logged as follows:
> >
> > Cache #1 - It was a tricky cache container in a relatively pointless
> > location but it belongs to a series and overall it wasn't that bad. My
> > log entry noted the creativity of the cache and thanked the owner.
> >
> > Cache #2 - A LPC cache located close to a main road and across from an
> > office building. Luckily I could block the traffic with my truck but
> > the container was too big and made the lamp skirt stick up on one
> > side, making it that much more obvious. My log entry said almost
> > nothing, "yup, right where it should have been" and instead of signing
> > off the way I always do "Thanks, Jared" I wrote "TN/LN, Jared". It's
> > subtle, I know.
> >
> > Cache #3 - A good cache with a significant location. The container was
> > nothing special and the technique was typical, but the location
> > wasn't. My log entry was long, very detailed (without spoilers) and
> > included a Thank You at the end.
> >
> > Cache #4 - A creative, homemade container in a vagabonds paradise.
> > There were blankets and other things very nearby that indicate
> > homeless people are usually here. My log briefly mentioned the cache
> > container being unique and then I described the homeless persons new
> > "shelter" nearby. I did not thank the cache owners.
> >
> > This morning I found another urban cache that while not in an
> > especially interesting spot, it was a well planned hide and well
> > stocked, large, cache. I also left a very long detailed log entry for
> > this cache expressing my enjoyment of finding it.
> >
> > AZcachemeister is right that we need to find a way to increase the
> > quality of urban caches. Urban hides have a place in geocaching and
> > allow for many people to enjoy the game that might not be able to find
> > the rural hides. Helping each other make better decisions about what
> > caches to go after is one thing that we can do to help. While my way
> > isn't blunt and to the point, I'm trying to praise good caches by
> > leaving detailed log entries and ignore bad caches by not giving them
> > the praise they DON'T deserve.
> >
> > Another, more obvious way of making a difference is by hiding our own
> > caches. I'm not very good at this and often struggle to justify my
> > cache placements because I either think they aren't creative enough or
> > I question whether or not the location is good enough. From what I've
> > seen lately though I would rather find an altoids container in a park
> > than find a well disguised cache behind Wal-Mart.
> >
> > Quickly, in regards to the concern about having your log entry deleted
> > if you leave negative feedback. You have a couple options.
> > 1. You could keep logging the same message back to the cache every
> > time it is deleted making a note that it was deleted. If anyone is
> > watching the cache they'll become aware of the situation and maybe
> > that will affect their next cache placement.
> > 2. You could log a seemingly innocent log entry and then a day or two
> > later edit that log entry and add back the comments in your original
> > log that was deleted. Owners aren't notified when a log entry is edited.
> > 3. While this one is controversial some people do it. If your log
> > entry is repeatedly deleted then log a find on your own cache and
> > specify that it is a log entry for GCxxxxx and the reason you can't
> > log it there followed by your original log entry.
> >
> > Anyone else have any ideas or comments on how we can improve the
> > caches in our state? Maybe we need a special acronym. Instead of TFTC
> > we could have DWYT (Don't Waste Your Time). Of course we could always
> > start using this website to generate log entries for us:
> > http://loungingatwalden.googlepages.com/RandomLog.html
> > My favorite generated log entry: "This cache was ill-conceived and
> > ill-received. You should turn your GPS over to the nearest
> > authorities! TNLN and almost didn't bother signing the log!!"
> >
> > Jared of AZBliss02
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: AZcachemeister <>
> > To:
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:17:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> > Well, I don't like to insult people by saying their cache is crap, but
> > aren't they insulting us by bringing us to those areas?
> > There is nothing of interest at the back of the 99? store, nor
> > anything clever about a shoe-polish can stuffed in a crack in the
> > building.
> > If we don't start taking some responsibility for our activities,
> > someone else will.
> > If enough people start 'telling it like it is' then the cachers hiding
> > those type of caches just might get the hint.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Regan Smith wrote:
> >
> > Tftc
> >
> >
> >
> > Tnlnsl
> >
> >
> >
> > Honesty will get your log deleted...
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > *From:*
> > <mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
> > [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] *On Behalf Of
> > *ShadowAce
> > *Sent:* Friday, February 09, 2007 6:15 PM
> > *To:* <mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > With all due respect. Oct 25, 2005 4:02 PM you sent email about how
> > Micros were evil and now that you had finally reached the top find
> > counter in the state you were not going to be going for micros any
> > longer. How only Urban caches had any reason to exist and people
> > should help stop the spread of micro spew.
> >
> > Yet a very large percent of your cache finds are micros even after
> > the posts about how Micros should go away. 1114 terrain 1 and 735
> > difficulty 1 according to the stats you placed on your profile. While
> > I am sick of lamp poles and guard rails myself, I merely pointed that
> > story out because of how many people caching in Arizona tell me at
> > almost every single event 'Permission is not required' or 'Its public
> > property'.
> >
> > If cachers want to place a micro every 600 feet they will. If they
> > throw caches out with no intention of ever maintaining them, they
> > will. Why? Because every other cacher is writing 'Great cache, thanks
> > for the hide' and not writing....
> >
> > /I was able to grab this cache quickly though I had to shield the
> > location with my rear side from the dumpster divers./ or /After
> > sifting through the garbage left by the homeless in the area, we found
> > your cache. /
> >
> > /Never would have known about this place, because we generally avoid
> > dumpsters.
> >
> > / I have been trying to be very honest in my logs about areas such as
> > these and instead of getting 'Hay thanks for warning me that place was
> > going to be so terrible', I receive emails saying 'Why are you such an
> > ass? If you dont like the cache, dont go find it!'
> >
> > Welp the problem with this is from the writeups you have no idea if
> > it will be a real interesting place such as the one we found last
> > night called Hope, or in a pile of trash until you get to the location.
> >
> > So instead of complaining about the TYPE of cache, I was merely
> > pointing out that Permission should be obtained on ALL cache hides.
> > Heck I spent 2 years getting permission for one place. 4 weeks to get
> > permission for another cache. 5 weeks of emails to get permission for
> > one location and then other people just throw more caches in the area
> > when they came.. Yep I caught hell from the person that granted me
> > permission to place mine after that.. Joy joy...
> >
> > If people hate micros so much, why do they continue to grab them and
> > write 'Thanks for the fun'?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/9/07, *Roping The Wind* <
> > <mailto:arizcowboy@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The geocacher who placed the altoid tin says he "wished others had
> > told him
> > this was not a good place to put a cache". I can only laugh at that
> > statement. The gc.com <http://gc.com> site clearly states that you
> > must get permission to
> > place a cache on private property!!! Did he not read that little tidbit
of
> > information? Typical of alot of urban cache hides. Is he now trying to
put
> > it onto the geocaching community as a whole? Making the whole
> > game/community
> > look bad?
> >
> > I do agree though that law enforcement over reacted... kinda like the
> > little
> > Boston cartoon 'bomb' scare thing.
> >
> > The other thing that comes to my mind is that he is relatively new to
the
> > game and this is most of what he has seen so far... a bunch of altoid
tins
> > behind stores and on electrical boxes and the like. So, he might have
> > thought it was totally ok to hide a cache like this... even though, as I
> > mentioned before, he should have gotten permission to place it in the
> > first
> > place.
> >
> > I do like this quote though: "I've discovered that I really don't like
> > urban
> > caching. I'd rather do it in the woods. That's where it's really fun,"
he
> > said.
> >
> > As of the past month and a half now, I have not found an urban cache
> > hide. I
> > dont mind going a week without finding a cache anymore. But I have
decided
> > that I only want to do rural area caches. Caches that require a hike
> > to get
> > to or maybe a nice 4x4 drive or maybe just a drive by cache placed in a
> > beautiful location way outside the city limit signs. Or maybe caches
> > placed
> > in small towns is ok too. Basically, caches placed with the location in
> > mind. I have been using the DGP geocaching site lately to pick and
choose
> > caches to find.
> >
> > The past month or so, I have found a much greater enjoyement for the
game
> > again. It feels like the old days of caching 4 or 5 years ago when I
> > first
> > began. I can't say I will never find an urban cache again. But I am
> > carefully picking and choosing which ones I want to find.
> >
> > Scott
> > Team Ropingthewind
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Laugh, share and connect with Windows Live Messenger
> >
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://ima
gine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline
> >
<http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://im
agine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline>
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > <mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
<mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Don't pick lemons.
> > See all the new 2007 cars
> >
<http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE0OGRsc3F2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2B
HNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3Y2Fycw-->
> > at Yahoo! Autos.
> >
<http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE0OGRsc3F2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2B
HNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3Y2Fycw-->
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona 's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
> > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/mail%0a>
> > with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile . Get started.
> > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/mail%0a>
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Looking for earth-friendly autos?
> > Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating"
> >
<http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2B
HNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI->
> > at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/2007021
1/85e1a506/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:46:04 -0700
> From: AZcachemeister <>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> To:
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> DWYT is good!
> Here's another that has been used:
>
> From Prime Suspect's Geo-lexicon.
> *DPM* -- Including the letters "DPM" in a cache log was a once-secret
> way to indicate the cache was of low quality. DPM is an abbreviation for
> "des palourdes mortes", which is French for "the dead clams". The entire
> French phrase is "Les longs sanglots des palourdes mortes blessent mon
> coeur avec un languor monotone pendant qu'ils dansent ? minuit", which
> translates to "The long sobs of the dead clams wound my heart with a
> monotonous languor as they dance at midnight". The idea was to include
> this phrase in a cache log to clue in others that the cache was of low
> quality. Rarely actually used, as the meaning of DPM quickly spread
> throughout the geocaching community, and its secrecy was lost.
>
> Jared Ross wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anyone else have any ideas or comments on how we can improve the
> > caches in our state? Maybe we need a special acronym. Instead of TFTC
> > we could have DWYT (Don't Waste Your Time). Of course we could always
> > start using this website to generate log entries for us:
> > http://loungingatwalden.googlepages.com/RandomLog.html
> > My favorite generated log entry: "This cache was ill-conceived and
> > ill-received. You should turn your GPS over to the nearest
> > authorities! TNLN and almost didn't bother signing the log!!"
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/2007021
1/c913d3f2/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:03:02 -0700
> From: AZcachemeister <>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!
> To:
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Perhaps we all should have a look at this site: The Geocacher's Creed
> <http://www.geocreed.info/index.html>
>
> AZcachemeister wrote:
> > DWYT is good!
> > Here's another that has been used:
> >
> > >From Prime Suspect's Geo-lexicon.
> > *DPM* -- Including the letters "DPM" in a cache log was a once-secret
> > way to indicate the cache was of low quality. DPM is an abbreviation
> > for "des palourdes mortes", which is French for "the dead clams". The
> > entire French phrase is "Les longs sanglots des palourdes mortes
> > blessent mon coeur avec un languor monotone pendant qu'ils dansent ?
> > minuit", which translates to "The long sobs of the dead clams wound my
> > heart with a monotonous languor as they dance at midnight". The idea
> > was to include this phrase in a cache log to clue in others that the
> > cache was of low quality. Rarely actually used, as the meaning of DPM
> > quickly spread throughout the geocaching community, and its secrecy
> > was lost.
> >
> > Jared Ross wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone else have any ideas or comments on how we can improve the
> >> caches in our state? Maybe we need a special acronym. Instead of TFTC
> >> we could have DWYT (Don't Waste Your Time). Of course we could always
> >> start using this website to generate log entries for us:
> >> http://loungingatwalden.googlepages.com/RandomLog.html
> >> My favorite generated log entry: "This cache was ill-conceived and
> >> ill-received. You should turn your GPS over to the nearest
> >> authorities! TNLN and almost didn't bother signing the log!!"
> >>
> >>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/2007021
1/07192acb/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
>
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
> End of Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6
> ********************************************
>
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
AzGeocaching.com
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Az-Geocaching] Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6Re: [Az-Geocaching] Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6->
AzGeocaching administrated by AdminLurker (version 2.3)