I had the same thing happen to me last year. Went and found a cache and
because I tracked it out rather than did it the way they wanted people to
find it and indicated in my log how I found it. The log was deleted. I was
able to get a responce and was told that they did not want the way that I
found the cache in the log. I was told I could relog it but without the
incidentals. I was soooo mad because I was very happy I was able to get the
cache the way I did.......
Bah humbug... Now it has been about a year since that happen and I just
could care less.....I even put that cache as one of my favs............
On 10/16/06, Cordell Harris <
cordh5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not to add fuel to the fire...But, shouldn't we remember this is a game?
> A kinda silly one, at that! Seriously think a private email could/would
> straighten this out. Meanwhile, keep the caches coming.
>
> On 10/16/06, Rand Hardin <rhrdn8@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > *Rand wrote:*
> >
> > Regan,
> >
> > *Re: Why I am thinking of public retirement.*
> >
> > Team Doink must be new to Geocaching. It sounds like this team felt
> > that you didn't actually find the cache yourself...so they pulled your plug
> > on the find. Maybe you should just reword your log entry, stating that you
> > found the cache and signed the log.
> >
> > Maybe instead of you "thinking of a public retirement" for yourself, it
> > sounds as if a *public flogging *of Team Doink is more in order!
> >
> > Rand (RandMan)
> >
> > *
> > ***********************************************************************************************************
> > *
> >
> > *Regan Smith wrote:*
> >
> > Yeah the direct mailing I got is what I gave them and I in no way gave
> > any information as to the true nature of this cache.
> >
> > But now I don't care.
> >
> > Which would be a fake small cactus buried atop a tube some feet East of
> > the large cactus which the GPS points to.
> > *
> > **********************************************************************************************************
> > *
> >
> > *AZcachemeister wrote:*
> >
> > I'm assuming your name is on the logsheet? Perhaps there was something
> > in your online log that the owners felt was too revealing? I think some
> > direct communication with THEM would get you an answer...
> > *********************************************************************
> >
> > *Regan Smith wrote:*
> >
> >
> > Pulled up to the cache site we began our search, I was on the phone
> > when RTW found the cache so knew what type of cache I was looking
> > for and still made one round trip, then spotted the cache......
> > ********************************************************************
> >
> > *Brian wrote:*
> >
> > So, what was your log entry then?
> >
> > Brian
> > Team A.I.
> > *********************************************************************
> >
> > *Regan Smith wrote:*
> >
> > Your log entry for the listing Home Grown #1 (Traditional Cache) was
> > deleted by Team Doink! at 10/14/2006 8:16:26 PM
> > *********************************************************************
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
--
EMa<<<--->>>Geo Gypsy
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)