That's just it. I have yet to field test one, but the new X series has
a new receiver system that is supposed to blow away what is already out
there for Garmin at least. The prices on these will drop soon, I'm
sure, to something close to the price of the non-X 60 series, as the
prices on those have dropped a solid $50 already.
Hey Scott,
I see your name has been changed in your e-mail to Cowboy Wind. Would
you like me to ship you some Bean-O?
Brian
Team A.I.
Cordell Harris wrote:
> I have to agree with you Paul. I find Magellan more sensitive
> therefore more stable under cover and in canyons. Mapsource topo is
> superior to Mapsend. I started with a couple Garmins dropped both
> seriously damaging the displays and through circumstances (couldn't
> find another Garmin in that part of Maine) bought a Magellan which has
> proven superior as a receiver at less cost. Take cover Hawk, we have
> shook the zealot tree!
>
> On 1/21/06, *Paul Ross* <paulross@cableaz.com
> <mailto:paulross@cableaz.com>> wrote:
>
> Cowboy Wind wrote:
>
> >
> >> From: Brian Casteel <bcasteel@uccinc.net
> <mailto:bcasteel@uccinc.net>>
> >> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> <mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> >> To: AZ Geocaching <az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> <mailto:az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>>
> >> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] To the Magellan Zealots...
> >> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:02:16 -0700
> >>
> >> http://www.gpsnow.com/gmmap60cx.htm
> >>
> >> The one big argument Magellan fans had with the Garmin series was a
> >> lack of expandable memory, until now. :)
> >>
> >> Brian
> >> Team A.I.
> >
> >
> > oooooohhhhhhhhh. That was Brian that said it... not me! :)
> > LLOLOLLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOL
> >
> > Not to mention... it already has 56mb of internal memory. But if
> you
> > really truly feel you need more than that.. go ahead and throw the
> > 64mb expansion card in there.. and... the card is included with the
> > GPS! Garmin never has to 'one up' its competitors, because they
> still
> > havent come out with anything that is remotely as good as the
> 60C/CS!
> > So, they decided to 'one up' themselves instead! Now, with the 60X
> > series! :))
> >
> > Scott
> > Team Ropingthewind
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> <mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> Well..... I don't know about that. I own both a Magellan Gold
> (good for
> 600+ finds) and a 60CS. I find that the 60 CS is far more 'twitchy'
> (bouncing all over) than the gold. As for getting you there they are
> both good. This is the second 60CS as the backlight went out of the
> first and was replaced under warranty. Both displayed the
> 'twitchyness'.
>
> Hawk
> Team RedHawk
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> <mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)