Re: [Az-Geocaching] updated stats

At least it is a positive response from GC.

"We know that there are a number of sites that use the scraped data to
provide a useful and legitimate service to the community."

The fact that Elias admitted that other sites are useful and legitimate
to me is a big step in the right direction. Wow. My head doesn't hurt
quite as bad.


Andrew Ayre wrote:

>As a counterpoint to being optimistic, read this:
>http://www.brillig.com/geocaching/status.html
>(sorry for not being optimistic!)
>Andy
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of
>Jared Ross
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:20 PM
>To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] updated stats
>
>
>Has anyone else seen the post in the forum from Elias?
>He/She makes it sound like this IP ban might only be
>temporary. Maybe there was just too much data scraping
>going on one day so it triggered their auto-blocker.
>Anyway, here's hoping.
>
>The Thread:
>http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=108925&st=50
>
>Jared
>
>--- Andrew Ayre <andy@britishideas.com> wrote:
>
>
>