[Az-Geocaching] re: buried caches

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Scott Sparks
Date:  
To: az-geocaching
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] re: buried caches
I also agree that caches should not be buried. "Covered" is one thing
but "buried" is something different. I haven't found the cache in
question so I can't comment on it.

-- Sprocket

>OK, so based on this I went back out this morning and reburied the cache even though I disagree and feel that this is not the intention the Geocaching site rules. And where are the "similiar" ones cuz I've done every cache for miles around there and 100 others and never seen one like this before. Are there any other opinions out there or is this a touchy subject?
>Zeldaandlink
>
>
>
>>>There are several in the area that are similar. No pointy >implement was
>>>needed, so it should be ok. Just different from what some >of the newer cachers have seen.
>>>
>>>
>>>Team RedHawk
>>
>>


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com