Re: [Az-Geocaching] buried cache

There are several in the area that are similar. No pointy implement was
needed, so it should be ok. Just different from what some of the newer
cachers have seen.

Hawk
Team RedHawk

AZcachemeister wrote:

> It's not really 'buried'. Just taking advantage of a 'pre-existing
> underground void'. :-X
>
> dzanna@cox.net wrote:
>
>> Would appreciate feedback from the list and especially an official
>> opionion if Artemis is reading this. Tonite after several visits,
>> several emails from the cache owner and alot of head scratching a
>> friend and I finally found a new cache. It was buried under gravel.
>> No I didn't actually need a shovel but none of the cache was visible
>> unless a large amount of gravel was removed to find a buried pipe
>> with a lid under which was the altoid tin. We replaced the lid but
>> did not rebury the cache, just sprinkled it with gravel so the green
>> irrigation type lid still showed there was something there. Do I need
>> to go back and cover it completely. Is that even legal? Please tell
>> me what you all think. Thanks.
>> ZeldaandLink
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>