Yeah, it's <Bill&Ted>most excellent</Bill&Ted>. When I worked at DPS, the head of chaplains for the dept saw me reading DaVinci Code and we talked in depth about it. It was then I learned of Angels&Demons, and he said I should have read it first...of course I didn't know that, but don't mind the fact that I'm reading it now. It's awesome. I read Digital Fortress just before this, and found that equally as gripping. Dan Brown is a truly gifted writer.
Brian
Team A.I.
----- Original Message -----
From: Apryl Clark
To:
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -
IS that not an AWESOME book??? I read it about 2-3 weeks before the Pope's health started declining and then once he did pass away I knew so much about what was going on it was neat. My coworker/friend is a Baptist Minister's wife and she was so "amazed" that I knew so much about the whole ritual. I finally explained about the book and we both had a good laugh. I passed the book along for her to read. I also found Da Vinci Code to be interesting however I feel that Angels & Demons was "better".
Apryl
>From: "Brian Casteel" <bcasteel@uccinc.net>
>Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
>Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -
>Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:22:55 -0600
>
>Scott is right. There is much much more to this saga than meets the
>eye. In one respect it would be worth telling the whole story, but
>in another more significant way it would violate the privacy and
>trust among those who do know what's going on. It's truly
>unfortunate, and I wish it were different. The current situation
>has and can once again affect me, so I can safely speak from two
>completely different angles.
>
>I'm actually kinda glad the Cardinals are sequestered. I'm smack in
>the middle of Angels & Demons, and the coincidental timing of where
>I am in the book as it relates to the Conclave, is simply eerie.
>
>Brian
>Team A.I.
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Roping The Wind"
><arizcowboy@hotmail.com>
>To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
>Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 3:35 PM
>Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -
>
>
>>Dan, I think you are missing the point here that Shadowace and
>>Cameron are saying. You are correct, Highpointer is totally within
>>reason to say what he wants as far as opinions are concerned. It is
>>america after all. BUT... what you might not know is that
>>Highpointer has PRIVATELY emailed other cachers (on several
>>occasions that I have been told about) and told them that he didn't
>>think how they handled a certain Travel bug was correct.
>>
>>One case in point: a good friend of mine, who is also a regular
>>geocacher.... placed a travel bug in a cache that was in east mesa.
>>It was a somewhat urban cache, but in a large desert field. I would
>>say this cache was definitely not near where muggles would
>>particularly stumble upon it (anymore so than any other urban
>>cache). It was probably 400' from the nearest road in a fairly
>>thick desert field. The next day he gets an email from Highpointer
>>(who is NOT the owner of this travel bug and is also NOT the owner
>>of this cache) saying that he shouldn't have placed a TB in that
>>cache as that cache is too urban and too likely to end up missing
>>(therefore I guess placing the TB at risk of disappearing).
>>
>>Highpointer can state his opinions in his logs.. there is no harm
>>done in that (although sometimes this too can create problems as
>>some people aren't particularly strong mentally and might take them
>>as harmful words). But, for him to email other cachers PRIVATELY
>>and tell them that he thinks this or that is wrong... well that is
>>just plain WRONG!!!!
>>
>>I wouldn't go as far as Brian did and tell Highpointer to take a
>>hike or anything... but Highpointer needs to just play his game how
>>he wants to play it and keep it at that and not tell other people
>>how to play it.
>>
>>Quoted in two ways:
>>
>>"I don't think that travel bugs should be placed in high traffic
>>area caches"
>>
>>"You should not place travel bugs in high traffic area caches"
>>
>>Those two sentences are two very similar quotes but yet very
>>different quotes. The first is simply stating an opinion, the
>>second is a command. Getting private emails like the second is not
>>cool.
>>
>>Scott
>>Team Ropingthewind
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: "Koch, Dan" <Dan.Koch@Eclipsys.com>
>>>Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>>>To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>>>Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -
>>>Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:27:37 -0400
>>>
>>>Right, and I'm just pointing out that he isn't the one slamming
>>>other
>>>people, telling people to get the heck out of here, etc. Heck,
>>>he's pretty
>>>much dropped out of sight as far as azgeocaching.com goes.
>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________
>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>http://www.azgeocaching.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)