Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMBrian Casteel at <-
MBill Nolan at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: AJ George
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
I recall there was a thread on gc.com in the last year or two that
addressed this very subject. I can't remember what the final tally was
and too tired to try to find it right now.


On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:27:26 -0700, Brian Casteel <> wrote:
>
>
> I prefer to look at it as being a cluster. J
>
>
>
> Brian
>
> Team A.I.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Loran
> Wilcox
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 4:14 PM
>
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes but we know the other sites don't play by the same rules so there
> density could be quite higher. The big problem if they are not labeled
> right how do you know which one you found.
>
>
>
>
>
> So it not a power grid but a grid lock.
>
>
>
>
>
> Team Sand Dollar
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: EvilFISH
>
>
> To:
>
>
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:44 PM
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
>
>
>
>
> those would be listed on both sites :)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: Brian Casteel
>
>
> To:
>
>
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:42 PM
>
>
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
>
>
>
> What if someone wanted to use a blue container with a white lid, or spawn
> mass-confusion by deliberately inter-mingling the containers? Oh, the
> insanity.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
> Team A.I.
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
> EvilFISH
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:39 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
>
>
>
> actually lets make that 128 GC.com plus 128 Navicaches plus 128 Terracaches
> and if the GC use red containers Navicache uses white and Terracaches use
> blue. thus avoiding confusion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: Tim Giron
>
>
> To: ;
>
>
> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:47 PM
>
>
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
>
>
>
>
> I know I'm joining this party late, but I brought an extra one: 128 as
> follows
>
>
>
>
> 
> row     num  cumulative side length

>
> 
>  1       11          0.000

>
> 
>  2       11        528.000

>
> 
>  3       11       1056.000

>
> 
>  4       11       1584.000

>
> 
>  5       10       2041.261

>
> 
>  6       11       2498.523

>
> 
>  7       10       2955.784

>
> 
>  8       11       3413.046

>
> 
>  9       10       3870.307

>
> 
> 10       11       4327.568

>
> 
> 11       10       4784.830

>
> 
> 12       11       5242.091

>
> 
>         128

>
>
>
>
>
> Now the real question, in light of the earlier discussions around "power
> trails"... is this a "power grid" ;)
>
>
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> Team AZFastFeet
>
>
>
>
>
> After I corrected my dumb error, I came up with 127. You can make one of
> the inbetween rows 11 as well and skip the triangles, but I don't think
> there is enough to do it twice, so it only adds one.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of David
> Thompsen
> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:05 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill's right : there's room to double up some square rows in the middle of
> the equilateral grid - probably enough to push the total to 128 or 129.
> Mathematicians will have to provide the best answer. Maybe I'll dump the
> question into the GC.com forums.
>
>
>
>
>
> --Dave, The Cow Spots
>
> Also, did you know?-
>
>
> The maximum number of caches you can fit in a square mile is 100? Well, that
> is IF GC.com actually stuck to their .1 "ahem"..."guideline".
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> DISCLAIMER: This message is confidential, intended only for the named
> recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are
> not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail
> address or by calling the telephone number associated with this
> transmission. Please delete this e-mail from your computer (or discard this
> fax). Thank You.
> ________________________________
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> ________________________________
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This message is confidential, intended only for the named
> recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are
> not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail
> address or by calling the telephone number associated with this
> transmission. Please delete this e-mail from your computer (or discard this
> fax). Thank You.
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>


--
AJ George II

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
AzGeocaching.com
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Az-Geocaching] GPS SensitivityRe: [Az-Geocaching] Terracaches->
AzGeocaching administrated by AdminLurker (version 2.3)