Yes I would like to see higher quality caches. We have a lot of good caches, and a lot of "here's a bush, here's a trash can, here's a light fixture" in a non descript area, hidden just because they can be hidden. It would be better to have more local control, since one size fits all rules dont really work as well. What applies in one part of the world/US doesnt necessarily apply here. But........would having it seperate from geocaching.com really work? Will we lose cachers in Arizona? GC.com would come up readily in a search, but would azgc.com? Can azgc.com handle the load? More importantly, would they want to? Oy the headaches!
TEAM 360 <
team360usa@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quality of caches would improve DRAMATICALLY if 3 out of 5 reviewers had to give it a "yes" vote before it got listed....Wouldn't you rather see QUALITY caches here in Arizona, rather than the current onslaught of behind-the-WalMart-dumpster-soggy-logsheet micro caches?
Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
"Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"
Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com ____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)