RE: [Az-Geocaching] If It's Not a Find, What Is It Then?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ford, Denny
Date:  
To: 'listserv@azgeocaching.com'
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] If It's Not a Find, What Is It Then?
I am finally going to speak up,
The ethical question only comes about because people are too worried about the stupid numbers and not the actual
enjoyment of finding the cache. I admit I was one of those, but if you don't look at the numbers, does it really matter
whether or not you find the cache. I can be a challenge on ones that are very difficult to reach or to grab due to high
traffic or difficulty where it takes you three or four times to sign the log. I agree the DNF should be left in tact
and quit worrying about the numbers and just enjoy the journey.


recovering GEOholic

Tres Hombres
Denny

_____

From: [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf
Of
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 4:34 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] If It's Not a Find, What Is It Then?


I'm new to this (chatty) group, having only found it a couple of weeks ago, and this ethical question is amusing.

DNF's should be left intact. Subsequent successes should be logged but previous DNFs should remain.

I log all DNFs as they occur. If I find the right spot but encounter a specific problem (lost or destroyed cache, no
log book, missing identifiers, etc.) that prevents me from claiming a find, I will just post a note in this case wait
for a response.

Several weeks ago I found a spot and I found the piece of wood that was supposed to direct me to the second stage. The
writing on the wood was washed-out, so this was not really a DNF. I posted a note and the owner has not responded, so I
haven't returned either.


In a message dated 12/9/2004 3:13:49 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, writes:

At 06:09 AM 12/8/2004, you wrote:
>This is my log from "AurorArborealis", which you just finished. It
>started out as a DNF and became a found log, while still retaining the
>history of the cache.
>
>I agree with your point of view about not erasing logs 100% I just handle
>it a little differently, and if a cache owner wanted me to have my find
>and my DNF on his page, I'd cheerfully comply.
>


I think you handled that just fine. What I have seen a lot of people do is
completely wipe out their DNF or Note log and replace it with the find one
once they did find it. I think that both logs should stay in place.


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com