Re: [Az-Geocaching] Find the center

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Robert & Linda Smith
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Find the center
I fear I've opened a can of worms with my question. Very interesting
read on all of your comments. If and when I get this together it will
not be as hard as several have suggested. No math, just a suggestion as
to where you might want to park and then go to approximate center.
Thanks again, Bob Smith, 1/2 of Team Petite Elite

David Thompsen wrote:

> I've done a lot of puzzle caches, and one thing being left unsaid,
> maybe it's obvious, it that if you want to work the math... convert
> all waypoints to UTM. This gives you nice (x,y) coordinates to work
> with, which respond nicely to geometry and trigonometry.
>
> As for the triangle, yeah, there's a lot of ways to define the
> "center". Intersection of medians, orthocenter, and circle touching
> all three points of the circle. I've seen puzzle caches using all of
> the above.
>
> --Dave
> Team Cowspots
>
> Steven Stringham <> wrote:
>
>     When I did orbis - in Tucson, I used Autocad to calculate the
>     center of
>     that triangle. The radius of the circle is only about 2 miles.
>     And, that
>     had me off (because I was not taking the curvature of the earth into
>     account) about 900'. I then recalculated, and was still off, but
>     came up
>     with another way to figure it out (because of the way the points
>     are layed
>     out, it allowed me to do some triangulation on it).

>
>     Good luck.

>
>     http://www.geocaching.com/seek/log.aspx?LUID=e0d67a76-96ce-4797-a186-0de15bfff37a

>
>     > Robert & Linda Smith wrote:
>     >> Thanks Brian,
>     >> The page you listed is a very interesting read. I really enjoyed it
>     >> (didn't understand all of it) but enjoyed the read. I don't
>     need to be
>     >> this close and accurate. A few feet this way or that is fine. I
>     just
>     >> wanted to be close.
>     >
>     > Hopefully you are talking about 3 points that are fairly close
>     together.
>     > The error actually gets large rather quickly.
>     > a couple points that are half the height or width of arizona
>     apart can
>     > have an error of 1/4 mile if you don't calculate it correctly.

>     >
>     > Brian Cluff
>     > Team Snaptek

>